Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Van Zalen Hans's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Van Zalen Hans's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Van Zalen Hans's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van Zalen Hans's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 08:00. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 06:17 | 46:04 to 39:47 | 78.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:41 | 06:15 to 04:34 | 21.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:02 | 04:31 to 04:29 | 0.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 03:56 to 03:56 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:59 to 01:59 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 02:58 to 02:58 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:22 to 04:22 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:53 to 01:53 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:58 to 03:58 | 0.0% |
| Van Zalen Hans | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:32 | 00:00 | 04:27 -00:55 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 03:56 | 03:32 | 04:23 -00:27 | 04:27 -00:55 |
| Running 2 | 05:10 | 07:28 | 04:45 +00:25 | 08:50 -01:22 |
| Sled Push | 01:59 | 12:38 | 02:45 -00:46 | 13:35 -00:57 |
| Running 3 | 07:18 | 14:37 | 05:09 +02:09 | 16:20 -01:43 |
| Sled Pull | 02:58 | 21:55 | 04:39 -01:41 | 21:29 +00:26 |
| Running 4 | 05:27 | 24:53 | 05:07 +00:20 | 26:08 -01:15 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:15 | 30:20 | 04:57 +01:18 | 31:15 -00:55 |
| Running 5 | 07:44 | 36:35 | 05:17 +02:27 | 36:12 +00:23 |
| Rowing | 04:22 | 44:19 | 04:43 -00:21 | 41:29 +02:50 |
| Running 6 | 05:29 | 48:41 | 05:10 +00:19 | 46:12 +02:29 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:53 | 54:10 | 02:05 -00:12 | 51:22 +02:48 |
| Running 7 | 05:36 | 56:03 | 05:08 +00:28 | 53:27 +02:36 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:31 | 01:01:39 | 04:49 -00:18 | 58:35 +03:04 |
| Running 8 | 05:52 | 01:06:10 | 05:39 +00:13 | 01:03:24 +02:46 |
| Wall Balls | 03:58 | 01:12:02 | 06:04 -02:06 | 01:09:03 +02:59 |
| Roxzone | 05:36 | 01:21:27 | 06:20 -00:44 | 01:21:27 |
Hans Van Zalen demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, ranking in the top 26% overall and top 28% in his age group. His standout strengths were in the strength-based exercises, such as the Ski Erg and Wall Balls, where he ranked in the top 1 percentile, indicating exceptional proficiency. However, his overall running time was slower than average by 4 minutes and 54 seconds, suggesting that his strength profile is more developed than his running capabilities. The initial fast pace of Running 1, followed by slower subsequent segments, indicates a pacing issue, where he might have started too fast, leading to fatigue in later segments.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Van Druten Maarten | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:21:20 | |
| Sparkes Adam | 2024 Glasgow | 01:21:55 | |
| Van Der Pluym Harmen | 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:21:07 | |
| Badcock Ashley | 2024 Melbourne | 01:21:55 | |
| Maxwell Justin | 2024 Birmingham | 01:21:29 | |
| Mccartney Shaun | 2023 Glasgow | 01:21:29 | |
| Marks Christopher | 2021 Austin | 01:21:14 | |
| Eekhof Hans | 2024 Maastricht | 01:20:57 | |
| Dye Daniel | 2024 Manchester | 01:21:53 | |
| Donaldson Michael | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:21:14 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
