Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 779 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Van Hamersveld J.'s performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Van Hamersveld J.'s pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Van Hamersveld J.'s performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van Hamersveld J.'s time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:11. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:29 | 53:06 to 51:37 | 35.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:06 | 08:28 to 07:22 | 26.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:48 | 07:35 to 06:47 | 19.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:47 | 03:34 to 02:47 | 18.7% |
| Rowing | 00:01 | 05:20 to 05:19 | 0.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:26 to 04:26 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:23 to 02:23 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:51 to 05:51 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 08:25 to 08:25 | 0.0% |
| Van Hamersveld J. | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:58 | 00:00 | 05:25 +00:33 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:26 | 05:58 | 04:47 -00:21 | 05:25 +00:33 |
| Running 2 | 05:46 | 10:24 | 06:00 -00:14 | 10:12 +00:12 |
| Sled Push | 02:23 | 16:10 | 03:44 -01:21 | 16:12 -00:02 |
| Running 3 | 06:05 | 18:33 | 06:40 -00:35 | 19:56 -01:23 |
| Sled Pull | 05:51 | 24:38 | 06:31 -00:40 | 26:36 -01:58 |
| Running 4 | 06:01 | 30:29 | 06:42 -00:41 | 33:07 -02:38 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:28 | 36:30 | 07:31 +00:57 | 39:49 -03:19 |
| Running 5 | 06:27 | 44:58 | 07:00 -00:33 | 47:20 -02:22 |
| Rowing | 05:20 | 51:25 | 05:21 -00:01 | 54:20 -02:55 |
| Running 6 | 07:31 | 56:45 | 06:43 +00:48 | 59:41 -02:56 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:34 | 01:04:16 | 02:48 +00:46 | 01:06:24 -02:08 |
| Running 7 | 06:46 | 01:07:50 | 06:48 -00:02 | 01:09:12 -01:22 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:35 | 01:14:36 | 06:58 +00:37 | 01:16:00 -01:24 |
| Running 8 | 08:35 | 01:22:11 | 08:15 +00:20 | 01:22:58 -00:47 |
| Wall Balls | 08:25 | 01:30:46 | 09:09 -00:44 | 01:31:13 -00:27 |
| Roxzone | 11:15 | 01:50:18 | 09:56 +01:19 | 01:50:18 |
J. Van Hamersveld's performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race places him in the top 64% overall and top 58% within his age group, indicating a solid performance among his peers. His total running time was 00:53:06, which is 00:57 faster than the average, suggesting his running capability is a strength. Despite this, his running split times show a pattern of starting slower than average in the early laps, achieving faster than average times in the middle laps, and slowing down again towards the end. This indicates a strong runner profile with potential for improvement in pacing consistency and endurance towards the latter parts of the race. His performance in strength exercises, particularly the Sled Push and Sled Pull, is commendable, placing him in the top 5% and 37% respectively, indicating a well-rounded athlete with both running and strength capabilities.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Röcher Fabian | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:50:01 | |
| Gibson Kemp | 2024 Glasgow | 01:50:40 | |
| Formet Alexandre | 2024 Marseille | 01:50:23 | |
| Dómina Nicanor | 2024 Bilbao | 01:50:24 | |
| Cerven Ragnar | 2024 Gdansk | 01:50:04 | |
| Noon Alex | 2022 London | 01:49:51 | |
| Armitage Matthew | 2023 Birmingham | 01:49:49 | |
| Gibson Jay | 2024 Manchester | 01:50:45 | |
| Wolter Daniel | 2019 Hamburg | 01:50:09 | |
| Lim Zhi Wei | 2024 Singapore | 01:49:58 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
