Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Van Bruggen Remco's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Van Bruggen Remco's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Van Bruggen Remco's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van Bruggen Remco's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:27. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:37 | 41:24 to 39:47 | 36.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:19 | 05:48 to 04:29 | 29.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:23 | 04:40 to 04:17 | 8.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:21 | 04:40 to 04:19 | 7.9% |
| Wall Balls | 00:19 | 05:54 to 05:35 | 7.1% |
| Rowing | 00:11 | 04:48 to 04:37 | 4.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:11 | 02:06 to 01:55 | 4.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:06 | 04:40 to 04:34 | 2.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:24 to 02:24 | 0.0% |
| Van Bruggen Remco | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:12 | 00:00 | 04:29 -01:17 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:40 | 03:12 | 04:23 +00:17 | 04:29 -01:17 |
| Running 2 | 04:41 | 07:52 | 04:46 -00:05 | 08:52 -01:00 |
| Sled Push | 02:24 | 12:33 | 02:46 -00:22 | 13:38 -01:05 |
| Running 3 | 05:04 | 14:57 | 05:10 -00:06 | 16:24 -01:27 |
| Sled Pull | 04:40 | 20:01 | 04:40 +00:00 | 21:34 -01:33 |
| Running 4 | 05:16 | 24:41 | 05:08 +00:08 | 26:14 -01:33 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:40 | 29:57 | 04:57 -00:17 | 31:22 -01:25 |
| Running 5 | 06:15 | 34:37 | 05:18 +00:57 | 36:19 -01:42 |
| Rowing | 04:48 | 40:52 | 04:43 +00:05 | 41:37 -00:45 |
| Running 6 | 05:20 | 45:40 | 05:11 +00:09 | 46:20 -00:40 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:06 | 51:00 | 02:05 +00:01 | 51:31 -00:31 |
| Running 7 | 05:16 | 53:06 | 05:09 +00:07 | 53:36 -00:30 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:48 | 58:22 | 04:50 +00:58 | 58:45 -00:23 |
| Running 8 | 06:23 | 01:04:10 | 05:40 +00:43 | 01:03:35 +00:35 |
| Wall Balls | 05:54 | 01:10:33 | 06:06 -00:12 | 01:09:15 +01:18 |
| Roxzone | 05:22 | 01:21:41 | 06:20 -00:58 | 01:21:41 |
Remco Van Bruggen showcased a commendable performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, finishing in the top 26% overall and top 29% within his age group. His overall time was 01:21:41. Despite a promising start, particularly in the initial running segment where he was significantly faster than average, his total running time was 00:41:24, which is slightly slower than the average, indicating a need for improvement in running endurance or pacing strategy. Remco demonstrates a balanced profile, with noteworthy strengths in both running and strength-based exercises, but there’s room for improvement in certain segments to enhance his hybrid capabilities.
By focusing on these areas, Remco can aim to improve his overall performance, leveraging his strengths and addressing the identified areas for improvement. Implementing the suggested training strategies and race-day tactics will be key to advancing his standing in future competitions.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Giese Max | 2021 Stuttgart | 01:21:53 | |
| Rommes Hessel | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:21:25 | |
| Braun Fabian | 2022 Hamburg | 01:22:01 | |
| Smidt Jeroen | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:21:32 | |
| Angehrn Oliver | 2019 Hamburg | 01:21:11 | |
| Beckman Tyler | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:22:10 | |
| Borque Domínguez Daniel | 2021 Madrid | 01:21:36 | |
| Martinez Albert | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:21:14 | |
| Rawls Ben | 2022 London | 01:22:06 | |
| Scheffer Volker | 2018 Hamburg | 01:22:06 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
