Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Smith Carl's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Smith Carl's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Smith Carl's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Smith Carl's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:45. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:37 | 45:59 to 43:22 | 69.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:59 | 03:52 to 02:53 | 26.2% |
| Rowing | 00:07 | 04:57 to 04:50 | 3.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:02 | 02:12 to 02:10 | 0.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:12 to 04:12 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:29 to 04:29 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:23 to 05:23 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:53 to 04:53 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:11 to 06:11 | 0.0% |
| Smith Carl | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:52 | 00:00 | 04:47 +00:05 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:12 | 04:52 | 04:30 -00:18 | 04:47 +00:05 |
| Running 2 | 05:06 | 09:04 | 05:06 +00:00 | 09:17 -00:13 |
| Sled Push | 03:52 | 14:10 | 03:03 +00:49 | 14:23 -00:13 |
| Running 3 | 05:38 | 18:02 | 05:36 +00:02 | 17:26 +00:36 |
| Sled Pull | 04:29 | 23:40 | 05:12 -00:43 | 23:02 +00:38 |
| Running 4 | 05:47 | 28:09 | 05:35 +00:12 | 28:14 -00:05 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:23 | 33:56 | 05:41 -00:18 | 33:49 +00:07 |
| Running 5 | 06:12 | 39:19 | 05:46 +00:26 | 39:30 -00:11 |
| Rowing | 04:57 | 45:31 | 04:54 +00:03 | 45:16 +00:15 |
| Running 6 | 05:49 | 50:28 | 05:35 +00:14 | 50:10 +00:18 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:12 | 56:17 | 02:17 -00:05 | 55:45 +00:32 |
| Running 7 | 05:50 | 58:29 | 05:35 +00:15 | 58:02 +00:27 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:53 | 01:04:19 | 05:26 -00:33 | 01:03:37 +00:42 |
| Running 8 | 06:48 | 01:09:12 | 06:17 +00:31 | 01:09:03 +00:09 |
| Wall Balls | 06:11 | 01:16:00 | 06:55 -00:44 | 01:15:20 +00:40 |
| Roxzone | 07:31 | 01:29:34 | 07:19 +00:12 | 01:29:34 |
Based on the splits analysis, Carl's best running lap was 00:04:52. His running segments were generally slower than the average, with Running 1 (00:04:52) being 00:15 slower, Running 2 (00:05:06) being 00:01 slower, Running 3 (00:05:38) being the same as the average, Running 4 (00:05:47) being 00:10 slower, Running 5 (00:06:12) being 00:26 slower, Running 6 (00:05:49) being 00:13 slower, Running 7 (00:05:50) being 00:15 slower, and Running 8 (00:06:48) being 00:25 slower.
Overall, Carl Smith showed strong performance in the HYROX race, placing in the top percentage of athletes in his age group. By focusing on improving his running performance, optimizing transitions, and implementing specific training strategies, he can further enhance his performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Kornelson Rik | 2023 Warschau | 01:29:20 | |
| Jago Ryan | 2024 Birmingham | 01:29:45 | |
| Camilleri Baptiste | 2024 Marseille | 01:29:23 | |
| Johnson Chad | 2022 Los Angeles | 01:29:15 | |
| Thewes Robin | 2019 Karlsruhe | 01:29:35 | |
| Luna Jesús | 2024 Mexico City | 01:29:09 | |
| Anderson Brandon | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:29:48 | |
| Foster Miguel | 2024 Manchester | 01:29:36 | |
| Durrant Chris | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:29:32 | |
| Day James | 2023 Manchester | 01:29:18 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:38:31 | |
| 2024 Birmingham | 01:39:00 | |
| 2022 London | 01:37:35 | |
| 2022 Birmingham | 01:37:06 | |
| 2024 Manchester | 01:34:14 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
