Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Smith Alana's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Smith Alana's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Smith Alana's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Smith Alana's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:54. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:07 | 46:17 to 43:10 | 63.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:54 | 05:55 to 05:01 | 18.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:35 | 02:36 to 02:01 | 11.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:11 | 05:06 to 04:55 | 3.7% |
| Rowing | 00:06 | 05:16 to 05:10 | 2.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:01 | 02:24 to 02:23 | 0.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:25 to 04:25 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:34 to 03:34 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:59 to 03:59 | 0.0% |
| Smith Alana | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:03 | 00:00 | 04:56 +00:07 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:06 | 05:03 | 05:01 +00:05 | 04:56 +00:07 |
| Running 2 | 05:35 | 10:09 | 05:18 +00:17 | 09:57 +00:12 |
| Sled Push | 02:24 | 15:44 | 02:35 -00:11 | 15:15 +00:29 |
| Running 3 | 05:42 | 18:08 | 05:34 +00:08 | 17:50 +00:18 |
| Sled Pull | 05:55 | 23:50 | 05:27 +00:28 | 23:24 +00:26 |
| Running 4 | 05:57 | 29:45 | 05:36 +00:21 | 28:51 +00:54 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:25 | 35:42 | 05:43 -01:18 | 34:27 +01:15 |
| Running 5 | 05:57 | 40:07 | 05:44 +00:13 | 40:10 -00:03 |
| Rowing | 05:16 | 46:04 | 05:17 -00:01 | 45:54 +00:10 |
| Running 6 | 05:50 | 51:20 | 05:38 +00:12 | 51:11 +00:09 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:36 | 57:10 | 02:11 +00:25 | 56:49 +00:21 |
| Running 7 | 05:54 | 59:46 | 05:37 +00:17 | 59:00 +00:46 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:34 | 01:05:40 | 04:29 -00:55 | 01:04:37 +01:03 |
| Running 8 | 06:22 | 01:09:14 | 05:58 +00:24 | 01:09:06 +00:08 |
| Wall Balls | 03:59 | 01:15:36 | 04:40 -00:41 | 01:15:04 +00:32 |
| Roxzone | 06:44 | 01:26:10 | 06:26 +00:18 | 01:26:10 |
Alana Smith delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Melbourne HYROX race, achieving an overall rank of 238 out of 1801 athletes, placing her in the top 13%. Within her age group (30-34), she secured the 59th position, ranking in the top 14%. Her overall completion time was 01:26:10, which is quite competitive given the field. A detailed look at her pacing shows a relatively conservative start in the first four running segments, with times consistently slower than the average. This indicates a potential need for better pacing strategy at the beginning of the race. The total running time was 00:46:17, slightly slower than average, suggesting that she has a stronger strength profile with room for improvement in running efficiency.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Bryant Rosa | 2024 Manchester | 01:26:30 | |
| Drew Vicki | 2024 Melbourne | 01:25:40 | |
| Billi Martina | 2023 Milan | 01:25:59 | |
| Bunk Jennifer | 2023 Köln | 01:26:23 | |
| Scargill Lily | 2024 Madrid | 01:26:39 | |
| René Anaëlle | 2023 Paris | 01:26:38 | |
| Schleiff Lea | 2018 Hamburg | 01:25:47 | |
| Thürbeck Julia | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:26:25 | |
| Scheffen Christine | 2024 Köln | 01:26:29 | |
| Kent Naomi | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:26:35 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
