Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2019 Essen using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:37. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:16 (From 47:44 to 44:28) | 70.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:36 (From 05:45 to 05:09) | 13.0% |
| BBJ | 00:24 (From 06:04 to 05:40) | 8.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:14 (From 02:28 to 02:14) | 5.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:06 (From 04:37 to 04:31) | 2.2% |
| Rowing | 00:01 (From 04:55 to 04:54) | 0.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 (From 02:55 to 02:55) | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 (From 04:27 to 04:27) | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 (From 06:42 to 06:42) | 0.0% |
| Scheffler Frank | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:27 | 00:00 | 04:50 -00:23 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:37 | 04:27 | 04:33 +00:04 | 04:50 -00:23 |
| Running 2 | 05:49 | 09:04 | 05:18 +00:31 | 09:23 -00:19 |
| Sled Push | 02:55 | 14:53 | 03:08 -00:13 | 14:41 +00:12 |
| Running 3 | 06:05 | 17:48 | 05:46 +00:19 | 17:49 -00:01 |
| Sled Pull | 05:45 | 23:53 | 05:23 +00:22 | 23:35 +00:18 |
| Running 4 | 06:16 | 29:38 | 05:45 +00:31 | 28:58 +00:40 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:04 | 35:54 | 05:59 +00:05 | 34:43 +01:11 |
| Running 5 | 06:09 | 41:58 | 05:57 +00:12 | 40:42 +01:16 |
| Rowing | 04:55 | 48:07 | 04:58 -00:03 | 46:39 +01:28 |
| Running 6 | 06:07 | 53:02 | 05:48 +00:19 | 51:37 +01:25 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:28 | 59:09 | 02:21 +00:07 | 57:25 +01:44 |
| Running 7 | 06:13 | 01:01:37 | 05:45 +00:28 | 59:46 +01:51 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:27 | 01:07:50 | 05:34 -01:07 | 01:05:31 +02:19 |
| Running 8 | 06:43 | 01:12:17 | 06:33 +00:10 | 01:11:05 +01:12 |
| Wall Balls | 06:42 | 01:19:00 | 07:13 -00:31 | 01:17:38 +01:22 |
| Roxzone | 07:01 | 01:32:33 | 07:42 -00:41 | 01:32:33 |
His overall time of 01:32:33 was respectable, but there are areas where he can improve to enhance his performance and potentially move up in the rankings. His total running time of 00:47:44 was 03:38 slower than the average finish time, indicating that he may need to focus on improving his running endurance and speed. It is worth noting that his best running lap time of 00:04:27 was 00:14 faster than the average, suggesting that he has the potential to excel in running segments with the right training.
To improve his running performance, Frank should incorporate specific exercises and drills to enhance his running endurance and speed. Interval training, such as high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and fartlek runs, can help him increase his cardiovascular fitness and improve his running speed. Additionally, incorporating hill sprints and tempo runs into his training routine can also be beneficial.
To address the areas where Frank lost time in the strength segments, he should focus on improving his overall strength and power. Including exercises such as squats, deadlifts, lunges, and kettlebell swings in his training routine can help him build lower body strength, which is crucial for the sled push, sled pull, and sandbag lunges segments. Incorporating exercises that target the upper body, such as push-ups, pull-ups, and shoulder presses, can also improve his performance in the Wall Balls segment.
Additionally, Frank should pay attention to his transition times in the roxzone. If his roxzone time is slower than average, it indicates that he may be taking longer breaks or struggling with transitions between exercises. To improve this, he should work on improving his overall fitness and practice efficient transitions during his training sessions. Practicing specific transition drills, such as moving quickly between different exercise equipment or practicing quick changes in movement patterns, can help him become more efficient during the race.
Overall, Frank Scheffler had a solid performance in the 2019 Essen Hyrox race. By focusing on improving his running endurance and speed, as well as his overall strength, he can enhance his performance in the segments where he lost the most time. Incorporating specific training strategies, exercises, drills, and race strategies tailored to his strengths and weaknesses will help him achieve better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Nilsson Tomas | 2024 Malaga | 01:32:33 | |
| Zeeb Ben | 2023 Chicago - North American Open Championship | 01:32:52 | |
| Mccann Frazer | 2023 Glasgow | 01:32:56 | |
| StampDunstan Oliver | 2024 London | 01:32:47 | |
| Swinburne Sean | 2023 Dublin | 01:32:31 | |
| Fleming Robert | 2023 Glasgow | 01:32:26 | |
| Driscoll Sean | 2022 London | 01:32:26 | |
| Amoros Perez Manuel Vicente | 2023 Valencia | 01:32:43 | |
| Esskandari Manzur | 2022 Leipzig | 01:32:54 | |
| Tong Frazet | 2024 Melbourne | 01:32:29 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Scheffler Frank
