Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Chicago Navy Pier using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 935 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Rounkles Kevin's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Rounkles Kevin's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Rounkles Kevin's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Rounkles Kevin's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:34. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 07:34 | 57:39 to 50:05 | 100.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:33 to 04:33 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:54 to 02:54 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:12 to 05:12 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:02 to 06:02 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:10 to 05:10 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:09 to 02:09 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:16 to 05:16 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 08:00 to 08:00 | 0.0% |
| Rounkles Kevin | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:43 | 00:00 | 05:18 -00:35 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:33 | 04:43 | 04:45 -00:12 | 05:18 -00:35 |
| Running 2 | 06:08 | 09:16 | 05:49 +00:19 | 10:03 -00:47 |
| Sled Push | 02:54 | 15:24 | 03:37 -00:43 | 15:52 -00:28 |
| Running 3 | 07:03 | 18:18 | 06:24 +00:39 | 19:29 -01:11 |
| Sled Pull | 05:12 | 25:21 | 06:22 -01:10 | 25:53 -00:32 |
| Running 4 | 07:14 | 30:33 | 06:25 +00:49 | 32:15 -01:42 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:02 | 37:47 | 07:13 -01:11 | 38:40 -00:53 |
| Running 5 | 09:05 | 43:49 | 06:46 +02:19 | 45:53 -02:04 |
| Rowing | 05:10 | 52:54 | 05:17 -00:07 | 52:39 +00:15 |
| Running 6 | 08:17 | 58:04 | 06:29 +01:48 | 57:56 +00:08 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:09 | 01:06:21 | 02:41 -00:32 | 01:04:25 +01:56 |
| Running 7 | 07:14 | 01:08:30 | 06:31 +00:43 | 01:07:06 +01:24 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:16 | 01:15:44 | 06:44 -01:28 | 01:13:37 +02:07 |
| Running 8 | 07:58 | 01:21:00 | 07:49 +00:09 | 01:20:21 +00:39 |
| Wall Balls | 08:00 | 01:28:58 | 08:55 -00:55 | 01:28:10 +00:48 |
| Roxzone | 09:38 | 01:46:29 | 09:24 +00:14 | 01:46:29 |
Kevin Rounkles overall performance placed him in the top 47% of all athletes, and the top 45% of his age group. This suggests a strong level of fitness and resilience, but there are areas where specific training could potentially improve his performance. His overall time of 01:46:29 suggests a balanced approach to the race, however, his total running time was slower than average, indicating room for improvement in his running. On the contrary, he performed exceptionally well in strength-based exercises like sled push, sled pull, burpees broad jump, farmers carry, and sandbag lunges, which suggests that he has a more strength-focused profile. In terms of pacing, Kevin started the race faster than average but gradually lost pace over time. This suggests that he might have started too fast and fatigued towards the latter half of the race.
Kevin's total running time was 5:55 slower than the average. This is an area where significant improvements can be made. Focusing on endurance training, such as long, slow runs to build up aerobic capacity, could be beneficial. He could also incorporate speed workouts into his training routine, such as interval training or tempo runs to help improve his speed over longer distances.
RoxzoneKevin's Roxzone time was 15 seconds slower than the average. This suggests he may have been taking too long to transition between exercises. To improve this, he could practice transitioning between different exercises to become more efficient. Also, improving his overall fitness, particularly his recovery time, could also help reduce his Roxzone time.
Wall BallsKevin's wall balls time was 55 seconds faster than the average, indicating a need for improvement. Incorporating exercises that strengthen the lower body and core, such as squats, lunges and planks, could improve his performance in this segment. Practising the wall balls exercise itself would also be beneficial.
Given Kevin's performance, one strategy could be to pace himself better at the start of the race. He could aim to start at a more sustainable pace to ensure he has enough energy to maintain a strong performance throughout the race. Additionally, he should focus more on the running segments, as these were areas where he lost significant time. As for the strength-based segments, he should strive to maintain his current performance level, as they are his strong suit. Finally, practicing transitions between exercises could help him reduce his Roxzone time, leading to a better overall time.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lendaro Aaron | 2023 Melbourne | 01:46:11 | |
| Cotterill Paul | 2024 Birmingham | 01:46:58 | |
| Wright Joel | 2023 London | 01:46:10 | |
| Burrows Paul | 2023 Birmingham | 01:46:30 | |
| Schmelz Jannik | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:46:07 | |
| Rebollo Jesus | 2024 Madrid | 01:46:11 | |
| Zyrun Michal | 2024 Gdansk | 01:46:23 | |
| Hamdan Léo | 2024 Marseille | 01:46:32 | |
| Gissane Ross | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:46:54 | |
| Westeneng Tom | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:46:07 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
