Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2019 Wien using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Pilz Stefan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Pilz Stefan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Pilz Stefan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Pilz Stefan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:24. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:48 | 43:43 to 37:55 | 90.6% |
| Wall Balls | 00:18 | 05:27 to 05:09 | 4.7% |
| Sled Pull | 00:17 | 04:17 to 04:00 | 4.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:01 | 04:13 to 04:12 | 0.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:11 to 02:11 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:48 to 03:48 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:25 to 04:25 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:21 to 01:21 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:07 to 04:07 | 0.0% |
| Pilz Stefan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:52 | 00:00 | 04:18 -00:26 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:13 | 03:52 | 04:19 -00:06 | 04:18 -00:26 |
| Running 2 | 05:01 | 08:05 | 04:35 +00:26 | 08:37 -00:32 |
| Sled Push | 02:11 | 13:06 | 02:38 -00:27 | 13:12 -00:06 |
| Running 3 | 05:25 | 15:17 | 04:58 +00:27 | 15:50 -00:33 |
| Sled Pull | 04:17 | 20:42 | 04:23 -00:06 | 20:48 -00:06 |
| Running 4 | 06:00 | 24:59 | 04:57 +01:03 | 25:11 -00:12 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:48 | 30:59 | 04:35 -00:47 | 30:08 +00:51 |
| Running 5 | 05:48 | 34:47 | 05:05 +00:43 | 34:43 +00:04 |
| Rowing | 04:25 | 40:35 | 04:37 -00:12 | 39:48 +00:47 |
| Running 6 | 05:37 | 45:00 | 04:58 +00:39 | 44:25 +00:35 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:21 | 50:37 | 01:59 -00:38 | 49:23 +01:14 |
| Running 7 | 05:48 | 51:58 | 04:57 +00:51 | 51:22 +00:36 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:07 | 57:46 | 04:31 -00:24 | 56:19 +01:27 |
| Running 8 | 06:16 | 01:01:53 | 05:25 +00:51 | 01:00:50 +01:03 |
| Wall Balls | 05:27 | 01:08:09 | 05:42 -00:15 | 01:06:15 +01:54 |
| Roxzone | 04:22 | 01:17:50 | 05:53 -01:31 | 01:17:50 |
Based on the splits analysis, Pilz performed above average in the Running 1 and Ski Erg segments, being 00:18 and 00:02 faster than average, respectively. However, he struggled in the Running 2, Running 3, Running 4, Running 5, Running 6, Running 7, and Running 8 segments, being slower than the average time for each.
Overall, Stefan Pilz has performed well in the Hyrox race, but there are specific areas of improvement to enhance his performance. By implementing the recommended training strategies and techniques, focusing on pacing, minimizing transition times, and maintaining a balanced approach to training, Pilz can continue to improve his results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Heimbach Harald | 2022 Karlsruhe | 01:18:01 | |
| Maljaars Gertijn | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:17:28 | |
| Teunissen Jan | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:17:58 | |
| Goncalves Phillip | 2024 Birmingham | 01:17:30 | |
| Hijkoop Rogier | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:18:18 | |
| Neildsy Rockstar | 2023 Glasgow | 01:17:30 | |
| Klein Norbert | 2024 Turin | 01:17:50 | |
| Ferry J J | 2024 Glasgow | 01:17:33 | |
| Brassington Aled | 2024 Manchester | 01:17:34 | |
| McKay Shamari | 2021 London | 01:17:32 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Basel | 01:16:44 | |
| 2022 Hamburg | 01:14:11 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
