Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Malmö using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire James Anthony's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights James Anthony's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the James Anthony's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve James Anthony's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:58. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 05:16 | 10:58 to 05:42 | 75.6% |
| Sled Pull | 01:07 | 05:31 to 04:24 | 16.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:25 | 02:59 to 02:34 | 6.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:10 | 02:07 to 01:57 | 2.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:12 to 04:12 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:59 to 03:59 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:35 to 04:35 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:54 to 03:54 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 39:59 to 39:59 | 0.0% |
| James Anthony | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:06 | 00:00 | 04:29 +01:37 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:12 | 06:06 | 04:24 -00:12 | 04:29 +01:37 |
| Running 2 | 04:23 | 10:18 | 04:50 -00:27 | 08:53 +01:25 |
| Sled Push | 02:59 | 14:41 | 02:49 +00:10 | 13:43 +00:58 |
| Running 3 | 04:54 | 17:40 | 05:13 -00:19 | 16:32 +01:08 |
| Sled Pull | 05:31 | 22:34 | 04:44 +00:47 | 21:45 +00:49 |
| Running 4 | 04:52 | 28:05 | 05:12 -00:20 | 26:29 +01:36 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:59 | 32:57 | 05:01 -01:02 | 31:41 +01:16 |
| Running 5 | 04:51 | 36:56 | 05:21 -00:30 | 36:42 +00:14 |
| Rowing | 04:35 | 41:47 | 04:44 -00:09 | 42:03 -00:16 |
| Running 6 | 04:50 | 46:22 | 05:14 -00:24 | 46:47 -00:25 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:07 | 51:12 | 02:07 +00:00 | 52:01 -00:49 |
| Running 7 | 04:47 | 53:19 | 05:13 -00:26 | 54:08 -00:49 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:54 | 58:06 | 04:51 -00:57 | 59:21 -01:15 |
| Running 8 | 05:19 | 01:02:00 | 05:43 -00:24 | 01:04:12 -02:12 |
| Wall Balls | 10:58 | 01:07:19 | 06:13 +04:45 | 01:09:55 -02:36 |
| Roxzone | 04:23 | 01:22:32 | 06:24 -02:01 | 01:22:32 |
Anthony's best running lap was 00:04:23, indicating his strength and speed in that segment. However, his performance in the Wall Balls segment was significantly slower than average, with a time of 00:10:58, which was 4 minutes and 44 seconds slower than the average. Other segments where he lost time compared to the average were Running 1, Sled Pull, and the total running time.
In conclusion, Anthony James had a strong performance in the Hyrox race, with notable strengths in running and speed. However, there are areas for improvement, particularly in the Wall Balls segment, Running 1, Sled Pull, and the total running time. By incorporating specific training strategies and techniques, focusing on strength and endurance, and implementing effective race strategies, Anthony can enhance his overall performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Haase Sven | 2019 Leipzig | 01:22:41 | |
| Valentini Simone | 2024 Madrid | 01:23:02 | |
| Sifuentes Ignacio | 2024 Dallas | 01:23:00 | |
| Braham Habib | 2024 Köln | 01:22:37 | |
| Standaert Stefan | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:22:12 | |
| Hoogenboom Thijs | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:22:19 | |
| Daly Mike | 2022 Birmingham | 01:22:11 | |
| Hamilton Nathan | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:22:49 | |
| Slotty Benjamin | 2018 Stuttgart | 01:22:48 | |
| Kaiser Luis | 2024 Dallas | 01:22:07 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Dublin | 01:14:53 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
