Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Paris using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 961 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Griffon Sarah's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Griffon Sarah's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Griffon Sarah's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Griffon Sarah's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:18. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 01:02 | 05:27 to 04:25 | 24.0% |
| Wall Balls | 01:00 | 04:27 to 03:27 | 23.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:55 | 05:25 to 04:30 | 21.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:48 | 02:53 to 02:05 | 18.6% |
| Run Total | 00:23 | 40:10 to 39:47 | 8.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:06 | 03:51 to 03:45 | 2.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:03 | 01:53 to 01:50 | 1.2% |
| Rowing | 00:01 | 04:58 to 04:57 | 0.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:32 to 04:32 | 0.0% |
| Griffon Sarah | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:37 | 00:00 | 04:38 -01:01 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:32 | 03:37 | 04:53 -00:21 | 04:38 -01:01 |
| Running 2 | 04:31 | 08:09 | 04:56 -00:25 | 09:31 -01:22 |
| Sled Push | 02:53 | 12:40 | 02:27 +00:26 | 14:27 -01:47 |
| Running 3 | 04:46 | 15:33 | 05:11 -00:25 | 16:54 -01:21 |
| Sled Pull | 05:27 | 20:19 | 04:57 +00:30 | 22:05 -01:46 |
| Running 4 | 04:45 | 25:46 | 05:11 -00:26 | 27:02 -01:16 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:25 | 30:31 | 05:03 +00:22 | 32:13 -01:42 |
| Running 5 | 04:46 | 35:56 | 05:17 -00:31 | 37:16 -01:20 |
| Rowing | 04:58 | 40:42 | 05:06 -00:08 | 42:33 -01:51 |
| Running 6 | 05:02 | 45:40 | 05:13 -00:11 | 47:39 -01:59 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:53 | 50:42 | 02:02 -00:09 | 52:52 -02:10 |
| Running 7 | 04:57 | 52:35 | 05:11 -00:14 | 54:54 -02:19 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:51 | 57:32 | 04:08 -00:17 | 01:00:05 -02:33 |
| Running 8 | 07:51 | 01:01:23 | 05:29 +02:22 | 01:04:13 -02:50 |
| Wall Balls | 04:27 | 01:09:14 | 04:08 +00:19 | 01:09:42 -00:28 |
| Roxzone | 05:57 | 01:19:27 | 05:37 +00:20 | 01:19:27 |
Sarah Griffon displayed a commendable performance at the 2024 Paris Hyrox event, finishing in the top 3% of her age group and overall participants. Her total running time was faster than average, illustrating her strength in running-based segments. Her pacing appeared well balanced in the first half of the race, with consistently faster-than-average times in the running segments and the ski erg. However, a noticeable slowdown was observed in the later stages, particularly in Running 8 and Roxzone segments. This suggests that while Sarah has strong endurance and speed, she may need to work on maintaining her stamina and strength in the latter stages of the race.
Considering Sarah's performance dip in the latter stages of the race, it would be beneficial for her to adopt a more conservative start, preserving energy for the more strength-intensive segments towards the end. Furthermore, she should practice transitioning between different exercises to improve her Roxzone timing. Lastly, incorporating a comprehensive cool-down routine after her training sessions can help improve her recovery times, allowing her to maintain a steady performance throughout the race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Horner Stacey | 2023 Manchester | 01:19:19 | |
| Mace Sandra | 2023 Malaga | 01:19:38 | |
| Sonnwald Jenny | 2024 Hamburg | 01:19:45 | |
| Rayner Emily | 2023 Paris | 01:19:17 | |
| Thibaut Orianna | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:19:23 | |
| Soares Carina | 2023 Barcelona | 01:19:16 | |
| Galama Sofia | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:19:30 | |
| Schulze Heike | 2022 Hamburg | 01:19:32 | |
| Paton Amelia | 2024 Manchester | 01:19:07 | |
| Buschmann Alexandra | 2024 Berlin | 01:19:27 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Marseille | 01:10:23 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
