Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Gamble Martin's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Gamble Martin's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Gamble Martin's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Gamble Martin's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 08:50. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 08:50 | 54:55 to 46:05 | 100.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:24 to 04:24 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:18 to 02:18 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:06 to 04:06 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:42 to 05:42 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:55 to 04:55 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:22 to 02:22 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:38 to 04:38 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:52 to 04:52 | 0.0% |
| Gamble Martin | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 07:33 | 00:00 | 04:58 +02:35 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:24 | 07:33 | 04:36 -00:12 | 04:58 +02:35 |
| Running 2 | 07:41 | 11:57 | 05:24 +02:17 | 09:34 +02:23 |
| Sled Push | 02:18 | 19:38 | 03:14 -00:56 | 14:58 +04:40 |
| Running 3 | 07:59 | 21:56 | 05:54 +02:05 | 18:12 +03:44 |
| Sled Pull | 04:06 | 29:55 | 05:38 -01:32 | 24:06 +05:49 |
| Running 4 | 08:22 | 34:01 | 05:54 +02:28 | 29:44 +04:17 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:42 | 42:23 | 06:19 -00:37 | 35:38 +06:45 |
| Running 5 | 05:36 | 48:05 | 06:08 -00:32 | 41:57 +06:08 |
| Rowing | 04:55 | 53:41 | 05:03 -00:08 | 48:05 +05:36 |
| Running 6 | 05:50 | 58:36 | 05:56 -00:06 | 53:08 +05:28 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:22 | 01:04:26 | 02:27 -00:05 | 59:04 +05:22 |
| Running 7 | 05:48 | 01:06:48 | 05:55 -00:07 | 01:01:31 +05:17 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:38 | 01:12:36 | 05:54 -01:16 | 01:07:26 +05:10 |
| Running 8 | 06:11 | 01:17:14 | 06:48 -00:37 | 01:13:20 +03:54 |
| Wall Balls | 04:52 | 01:23:25 | 07:41 -02:49 | 01:20:08 +03:17 |
| Roxzone | 07:54 | 01:36:02 | 08:13 -00:19 | 01:36:02 |
Martin Gamble demonstrated commendable strength in the HYROX event, particularly excelling in strength-based exercises such as the Sled Push, Sled Pull, Sandbag Lunges, and Wall Balls, where he ranked in the top 10%. However, his total running time was significantly slower than the average, suggesting that his performance is more strength-oriented rather than running-focused. His pacing strategy might have been too conservative at the start, as indicated by the slower times in the first four running segments, before picking up pace in the latter stages. This indicates a runner profile that could benefit from increased endurance and speed work.
By implementing these strategies and focusing on the identified improvement areas, Martin can enhance his overall performance in future HYROX races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Jean Baptiste Bolo Joris | 2024 Madrid | 01:35:50 | |
| Collins Euan | 2024 Glasgow | 01:36:02 | |
| Vitrotti Tommaso | 2024 Turin | 01:35:50 | |
| Carden Dale | 2022 Manchester | 01:35:41 | |
| Bracken John | 2024 Madrid | 01:36:27 | |
| Abelman Jerome | 2022 Los Angeles | 01:35:46 | |
| Kappel Fabian | 2023 Hamburg | 01:36:24 | |
| Gleeson Liam | 2024 London | 01:36:15 | |
| Last Mathias | 2024 Malaga | 01:36:19 | |
| Krüger Mario | 2024 Hamburg | 01:36:01 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
