Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Evans John's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Evans John's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Evans John's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Evans John's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:45. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:39 | 39:08 to 37:29 | 34.7% |
| Wall Balls | 01:27 | 06:30 to 05:03 | 30.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:08 | 05:12 to 04:04 | 23.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:23 | 04:29 to 04:06 | 8.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:06 | 02:23 to 02:17 | 2.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:02 | 04:13 to 04:11 | 0.7% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:36 to 03:36 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:17 to 04:17 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:41 to 01:41 | 0.0% |
| Evans John | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:14 | 00:00 | 04:15 -01:01 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:13 | 03:14 | 04:18 -00:05 | 04:15 -01:01 |
| Running 2 | 04:40 | 07:27 | 04:32 +00:08 | 08:33 -01:06 |
| Sled Push | 02:23 | 12:07 | 02:37 -00:14 | 13:05 -00:58 |
| Running 3 | 04:59 | 14:30 | 04:54 +00:05 | 15:42 -01:12 |
| Sled Pull | 03:36 | 19:29 | 04:22 -00:46 | 20:36 -01:07 |
| Running 4 | 05:02 | 23:05 | 04:52 +00:10 | 24:58 -01:53 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:12 | 28:07 | 04:32 +00:40 | 29:50 -01:43 |
| Running 5 | 05:07 | 33:19 | 05:00 +00:07 | 34:22 -01:03 |
| Rowing | 04:17 | 38:26 | 04:36 -00:19 | 39:22 -00:56 |
| Running 6 | 05:08 | 42:43 | 04:53 +00:15 | 43:58 -01:15 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:41 | 47:51 | 01:59 -00:18 | 48:51 -01:00 |
| Running 7 | 05:05 | 49:32 | 04:52 +00:13 | 50:50 -01:18 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:29 | 54:37 | 04:28 +00:01 | 55:42 -01:05 |
| Running 8 | 05:56 | 59:06 | 05:17 +00:39 | 01:00:10 -01:04 |
| Wall Balls | 06:30 | 01:05:02 | 05:39 +00:51 | 01:05:27 -00:25 |
| Roxzone | 05:26 | 01:16:52 | 05:46 -00:20 | 01:16:52 |
John Evans, competing in the HYROX category, Age group 40-44, displayed an impressive performance in the 2024 Manchester event. He ranked in the top 82% overall and top 88% in his age group, showcasing his high fitness level. John's total running time was slower than average, indicating that he has a more strength-based profile. However, his fast starts, particularly in the first four running segments, indicate a potential overemphasis on speed at the beginning of the race. This could have resulted in a higher energy expenditure early on, leading to slower split times in the latter parts of the race.
During the race, John should consider pacing himself better, especially in the initial running segments where he tends to start faster than average. This could help maintain his energy levels throughout the race, potentially improving his overall time. He should also consider incorporating active recovery in his transitions, helping to maintain his fitness level throughout the race. Finally, considering his strength-based profile, focusing on maintaining form and technique in strength intensive segments could help mitigate the slower running times.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Schaart Wout | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:17:13 | |
| Logan Jonny | 2024 Glasgow | 01:16:42 | |
| Couzinet Marlon | 2020 Hannover | 01:16:24 | |
| Safner Darko | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:16:33 | |
| Vael Thomas | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:16:49 | |
| Crump Alex | 2022 London | 01:16:29 | |
| Peterson Charles | 2024 New York | 01:16:44 | |
| Cox Simon | 2024 Birmingham | 01:17:00 | |
| Edgar Lee | 2024 Dublin | 01:16:57 | |
| Lambert Seb | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:16:55 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 London | 01:17:37 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
