Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2019 Hannover using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Bremer Daniel's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Bremer Daniel's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Bremer Daniel's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Bremer Daniel's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:36. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:52 | 41:18 to 39:26 | 40.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:32 | 06:02 to 04:30 | 33.3% |
| Wall Balls | 00:25 | 05:55 to 05:30 | 9.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:20 | 04:35 to 04:15 | 7.2% |
| Rowing | 00:12 | 04:48 to 04:36 | 4.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:12 | 02:06 to 01:54 | 4.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:03 | 04:19 to 04:16 | 1.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:18 to 02:18 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:33 to 03:33 | 0.0% |
| Bremer Daniel | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:37 | 00:00 | 04:22 -00:45 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:19 | 03:37 | 04:21 -00:02 | 04:22 -00:45 |
| Running 2 | 04:55 | 07:56 | 04:44 +00:11 | 08:43 -00:47 |
| Sled Push | 02:18 | 12:51 | 02:44 -00:26 | 13:27 -00:36 |
| Running 3 | 05:37 | 15:09 | 05:07 +00:30 | 16:11 -01:02 |
| Sled Pull | 04:35 | 20:46 | 04:34 +00:01 | 21:18 -00:32 |
| Running 4 | 05:40 | 25:21 | 05:06 +00:34 | 25:52 -00:31 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:02 | 31:01 | 04:54 +01:08 | 30:58 +00:03 |
| Running 5 | 05:22 | 37:03 | 05:15 +00:07 | 35:52 +01:11 |
| Rowing | 04:48 | 42:25 | 04:41 +00:07 | 41:07 +01:18 |
| Running 6 | 05:10 | 47:13 | 05:08 +00:02 | 45:48 +01:25 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:06 | 52:23 | 02:04 +00:02 | 50:56 +01:27 |
| Running 7 | 05:09 | 54:29 | 05:07 +00:02 | 53:00 +01:29 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:33 | 59:38 | 04:45 -01:12 | 58:07 +01:31 |
| Running 8 | 05:52 | 01:03:11 | 05:35 +00:17 | 01:02:52 +00:19 |
| Wall Balls | 05:55 | 01:09:03 | 05:58 -00:03 | 01:08:27 +00:36 |
| Roxzone | 05:45 | 01:20:36 | 06:11 -00:26 | 01:20:36 |
Based on the splits analysis, it is evident that Daniel excelled in the Ski Erg and Sled Push segments, where he performed faster than the average. These areas can be considered his strengths. However, he struggled in the Running 1, Burpees Broad Jump, Running 4, Running 3, and Running 2 segments, where he lost significant time compared to the average. These are the areas that require improvement.
In conclusion, while Daniel Bremer had a strong performance in the HYROX race, there are specific areas where he can improve to enhance his overall performance. By focusing on the identified segments for improvement, implementing specific training strategies, and employing effective race strategies, Daniel has the potential to further excel in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Oliver Tom | 2024 London | 01:20:38 | |
| Shipman David | 2023 London | 01:20:40 | |
| Cuesta Igor | 2024 Bilbao | 01:20:14 | |
| Augustyniak Bart | 2024 Sydney | 01:20:48 | |
| Gilbride Liam | 2023 Glasgow | 01:20:38 | |
| Whitehead Gregory | 2024 Manchester | 01:20:12 | |
| Garfinkel Ian | 2024 New York | 01:20:15 | |
| Matos Daniel | 2022 Madrid | 01:20:21 | |
| Davies Sammy | 2023 London | 01:20:23 | |
| Kretzschmann Fabian | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:20:50 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
