Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Madrid using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Allister Malcolm's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Allister Malcolm's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Allister Malcolm's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Allister Malcolm's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:09. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:02 | 07:14 to 05:12 | 64.6% |
| Run Total | 00:38 | 43:07 to 42:29 | 20.1% |
| Rowing | 00:19 | 05:06 to 04:47 | 10.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:10 | 04:35 to 04:25 | 5.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:48 to 02:48 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:07 to 04:07 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:59 to 01:59 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:55 to 04:55 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:46 to 05:46 | 0.0% |
| Allister Malcolm | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:43 | 00:00 | 04:41 +01:02 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:35 | 05:43 | 04:29 +00:06 | 04:41 +01:02 |
| Running 2 | 04:49 | 10:18 | 05:03 -00:14 | 09:10 +01:08 |
| Sled Push | 02:48 | 15:07 | 02:59 -00:11 | 14:13 +00:54 |
| Running 3 | 05:10 | 17:55 | 05:31 -00:21 | 17:12 +00:43 |
| Sled Pull | 04:07 | 23:05 | 05:04 -00:57 | 22:43 +00:22 |
| Running 4 | 05:16 | 27:12 | 05:29 -00:13 | 27:47 -00:35 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:14 | 32:28 | 05:32 +01:42 | 33:16 -00:48 |
| Running 5 | 05:30 | 39:42 | 05:40 -00:10 | 38:48 +00:54 |
| Rowing | 05:06 | 45:12 | 04:52 +00:14 | 44:28 +00:44 |
| Running 6 | 05:20 | 50:18 | 05:31 -00:11 | 49:20 +00:58 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:59 | 55:38 | 02:14 -00:15 | 54:51 +00:47 |
| Running 7 | 05:34 | 57:37 | 05:30 +00:04 | 57:05 +00:32 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:55 | 01:03:11 | 05:16 -00:21 | 01:02:35 +00:36 |
| Running 8 | 05:48 | 01:08:06 | 06:08 -00:20 | 01:07:51 +00:15 |
| Wall Balls | 05:46 | 01:13:54 | 06:46 -01:00 | 01:13:59 -00:05 |
| Roxzone | 08:13 | 01:27:47 | 07:02 +01:11 | 01:27:47 |
Malcolm Allister displayed a commendable performance in the 2024 Madrid HYROX race, ranking in the top 37% of overall athletes and top 42% in his age group. A key highlight of his performance was his total running time, which was faster than average by 00:42. This suggests that Malcolm has a strong runner's profile and excels in the running segments of the race. However, his slower than average time in the Roxzone indicates a need to improve his overall fitness and transition times. His pacing seemed to start slow in Running 1, but he quickly caught up and exceeded the average in subsequent runs. This pattern suggests that Malcolm may benefit from a faster start in future races.
To enhance race performance, Malcolm might consider the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Orsillo Ennio | 2024 Köln | 01:27:38 | |
| De Vos Stefan | 2024 Maastricht | 01:27:55 | |
| Bakkenes Dave | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:28:02 | |
| Beerbaum Felix | 2023 Hamburg | 01:27:56 | |
| Hartmann Danny | 2018 Hamburg | 01:27:23 | |
| Machin Fergus | 2024 Glasgow | 01:27:18 | |
| Helmle Stefan | 2024 Köln | 01:27:37 | |
| Khentous Akli | 2024 Paris | 01:28:10 | |
| Van Duijvenvoorde Danny | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:28:11 | |
| Wallace Stew | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:28:13 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Dublin | 01:35:44 | |
| 2024 Glasgow | 01:26:12 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
