Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Aalbers Maud's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Aalbers Maud's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Aalbers Maud's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Aalbers Maud's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:18. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:56 | 48:37 to 45:41 | 55.3% |
| Wall Balls | 01:34 | 06:10 to 04:36 | 29.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:28 | 05:32 to 05:04 | 8.8% |
| Rowing | 00:13 | 05:32 to 05:19 | 4.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:07 | 02:44 to 02:37 | 2.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:57 to 04:57 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:25 to 05:25 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:51 to 01:51 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:34 to 04:34 | 0.0% |
| Aalbers Maud | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:04 | 00:00 | 05:09 -01:05 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:32 | 04:04 | 05:08 +00:24 | 05:09 -01:05 |
| Running 2 | 05:49 | 09:36 | 05:33 +00:16 | 10:17 -00:41 |
| Sled Push | 02:44 | 15:25 | 02:48 -00:04 | 15:50 -00:25 |
| Running 3 | 06:05 | 18:09 | 05:53 +00:12 | 18:38 -00:29 |
| Sled Pull | 04:57 | 24:14 | 05:52 -00:55 | 24:31 -00:17 |
| Running 4 | 06:18 | 29:11 | 05:53 +00:25 | 30:23 -01:12 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:25 | 35:29 | 06:15 -00:50 | 36:16 -00:47 |
| Running 5 | 06:17 | 40:54 | 06:01 +00:16 | 42:31 -01:37 |
| Rowing | 05:32 | 47:11 | 05:25 +00:07 | 48:32 -01:21 |
| Running 6 | 06:22 | 52:43 | 05:56 +00:26 | 53:57 -01:14 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:51 | 59:05 | 02:18 -00:27 | 59:53 -00:48 |
| Running 7 | 06:43 | 01:00:56 | 05:53 +00:50 | 01:02:11 -01:15 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:34 | 01:07:39 | 04:53 -00:19 | 01:08:04 -00:25 |
| Running 8 | 07:02 | 01:12:13 | 06:21 +00:41 | 01:12:57 -00:44 |
| Wall Balls | 06:10 | 01:19:15 | 05:03 +01:07 | 01:19:18 -00:03 |
| Roxzone | 06:10 | 01:31:26 | 07:05 -00:55 | 01:31:26 |
Maud Aalbers delivered an impressive performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, securing an overall rank of 458, placing her in the top 14% of 3118 athletes. Within her age group, she ranked 53rd, marking her in the top 13% of 393 participants. Her overall time was 01:31:26, with a total running time of 00:48:37, which was 01:20 slower than the average. This suggests that Maud has a balanced profile, slightly more inclined towards strength, as her running performance trails her strength performance. Notably, Maud started the race strong, particularly in Running 1, indicative of a fast initial pace. However, the subsequent running segments showed a gradual slowdown, suggesting possible early exertion.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gelbert Yvonne | 2023 Hamburg | 01:31:47 | |
| Escobar López Rosy | 2023 Malaga | 01:31:55 | |
| Groenewoud Isa | 2024 Maastricht | 01:31:40 | |
| Butruk Luiza | 2024 Gdansk | 01:31:18 | |
| Terlau Marina | 2022 Hamburg | 01:31:02 | |
| Verwijlen Pam | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:31:18 | |
| Cooke Claire | 2023 London | 01:31:17 | |
| De Graaf Quirine | 2023 Dubai | 01:31:02 | |
| Verbakel Emily | 2022 Maastricht | 01:31:43 | |
| Hibell Dominique | 2024 Poznan | 01:30:56 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:39:35 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
