Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of Millar Stephem's race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where Millar Stephem hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare Millar Stephem’s performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Millar Stephem's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:35. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 04:16 | 09:41 to 05:25 | 56.3% |
| Sled Pull | 01:20 | 05:32 to 04:12 | 17.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:16 | 05:41 to 04:25 | 16.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:20 | 04:42 to 04:22 | 4.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:13 | 04:28 to 04:15 | 2.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:08 | 02:00 to 01:52 | 1.8% |
| Rowing | 00:02 | 04:37 to 04:35 | 0.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:22 to 02:22 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 35:27 to 35:27 | 0.0% |
| Millar Stephem | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:20 | 00:00 | 04:22 -01:02 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:28 | 03:20 | 04:21 +00:07 | 04:22 -01:02 |
| Running 2 | 04:14 | 07:48 | 04:42 -00:28 | 08:43 -00:55 |
| Sled Push | 02:22 | 12:02 | 02:43 -00:21 | 13:25 -01:23 |
| Running 3 | 04:34 | 14:24 | 05:05 -00:31 | 16:08 -01:44 |
| Sled Pull | 05:32 | 18:58 | 04:32 +01:00 | 21:13 -02:15 |
| Running 4 | 04:39 | 24:30 | 05:05 -00:26 | 25:45 -01:15 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:41 | 29:09 | 04:48 +00:53 | 30:50 -01:41 |
| Running 5 | 04:45 | 34:50 | 05:13 -00:28 | 35:38 -00:48 |
| Rowing | 04:37 | 39:35 | 04:40 -00:03 | 40:51 -01:16 |
| Running 6 | 04:42 | 44:12 | 05:06 -00:24 | 45:31 -01:19 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:00 | 48:54 | 02:02 -00:02 | 50:37 -01:43 |
| Running 7 | 04:35 | 50:54 | 05:05 -00:30 | 52:39 -01:45 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:42 | 55:29 | 04:41 +00:01 | 57:44 -02:15 |
| Running 8 | 04:42 | 01:00:11 | 05:33 -00:51 | 01:02:25 -02:14 |
| Wall Balls | 09:41 | 01:04:53 | 05:55 +03:46 | 01:07:58 -03:05 |
| Roxzone | 05:34 | 01:20:00 | 06:07 -00:33 | 01:20:00 |
Based on his splits analysis, Stephen performed particularly well in the running segments, consistently finishing faster than the average time. His best running lap was an impressive 00:03:20. However, there were some segments where he lost valuable time, namely the Wall Balls, Burpees Broad Jump, and Sled Pull.
In conclusion, Stephen Millar had a strong performance in the Hyrox race in London. He excelled in the running segments, finishing faster than the average time. However, there is room for improvement in segments such as Wall Balls, Burpees Broad Jump, and Sled Pull. By incorporating specific training strategies and techniques, such as strength exercises, form corrections, and pacing strategies, Stephen can further enhance his performance and continue to excel in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Merckx Florian | 2023 Madrid | 01:19:32 | |
| Höllersberger Felix | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:20:26 | |
| Smith Jimmy | 2024 Dallas | 01:20:23 | |
| Eberle Oscar | 2023 Anaheim | 01:19:55 | |
| Abols Kevin | 2022 Manchester | 01:19:38 | |
| Harvey Ant | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:20:20 | |
| Tao Ben | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:19:33 | |
| Godsil Johnny | 2023 Stockholm | 01:19:40 | |
| Johnson Christopher | 2023 Chicago | 01:19:36 | |
| Lieshout Guus | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:20:26 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
