Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 795 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Farrell James's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Farrell James's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Farrell James's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Farrell James's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:42. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Push | 01:07 | 02:58 to 01:51 | 30.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:36 | 02:06 to 01:30 | 16.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:28 | 03:44 to 03:16 | 12.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:24 | 03:48 to 03:24 | 10.8% |
| Run Total | 00:22 | 33:38 to 33:16 | 9.9% |
| Wall Balls | 00:19 | 04:30 to 04:11 | 8.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:12 | 03:22 to 03:10 | 5.4% |
| Rowing | 00:08 | 04:24 to 04:16 | 3.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:06 | 04:04 to 03:58 | 2.7% |
| Farrell James | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:09 | 00:00 | 03:47 -00:38 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:04 | 03:09 | 04:07 -00:03 | 03:47 -00:38 |
| Running 2 | 04:02 | 07:13 | 03:59 +00:03 | 07:54 -00:41 |
| Sled Push | 02:58 | 11:15 | 02:20 +00:38 | 11:53 -00:38 |
| Running 3 | 04:33 | 14:13 | 04:15 +00:18 | 14:13 +00:00 |
| Sled Pull | 03:44 | 18:46 | 03:38 +00:06 | 18:28 +00:18 |
| Running 4 | 04:20 | 22:30 | 04:14 +00:06 | 22:06 +00:24 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:22 | 26:50 | 03:32 -00:10 | 26:20 +00:30 |
| Running 5 | 04:24 | 30:12 | 04:20 +00:04 | 29:52 +00:20 |
| Rowing | 04:24 | 34:36 | 04:21 +00:03 | 34:12 +00:24 |
| Running 6 | 04:19 | 39:00 | 04:17 +00:02 | 38:33 +00:27 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:06 | 43:19 | 01:42 +00:24 | 42:50 +00:29 |
| Running 7 | 04:23 | 45:25 | 04:17 +00:06 | 44:32 +00:53 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:48 | 49:48 | 03:41 +00:07 | 48:49 +00:59 |
| Running 8 | 04:32 | 53:36 | 04:33 -00:01 | 52:30 +01:06 |
| Wall Balls | 04:30 | 58:08 | 04:35 -00:05 | 57:03 +01:05 |
| Roxzone | 03:40 | 01:06:09 | 04:31 -00:51 | 01:06:09 |
Pacing and Profile:
James demonstrated a well-paced race, maintaining a consistent speed throughout. His overall running time of 00:33:38 indicates that he has a solid running profile. However, it is important to note that his running time was 00:48 slower than the average, suggesting that he could benefit from additional training in running to further improve his performance.
In conclusion, James Farrell exhibited an impressive performance in the HYROX race, demonstrating his strength and dedication as a fitness athlete. By focusing on specific areas of improvement such as running, sled pushing, farmers carry, and running endurance, he can further enhance his performance. Implementing the suggested training strategies, exercises, and race strategies will help James continue to excel in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Wriedt Carsten | 2024 Berlin | 01:06:05 | |
| OhtakeGordon Akio | 2024 Houston | 01:05:40 | |
| Richey Nathan | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:06:00 | |
| Casey O' Shea Michael | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:06:35 | |
| Astrauskas Lukas | 2024 Poznan | 01:05:56 | |
| Camilleri Alister | 2024 Milan | 01:05:52 | |
| Maselli Luca | 2023 Barcelona | 01:05:49 | |
| Guerrero Torreblanca Joel | 2024 Malaga | 01:05:54 | |
| Hendrie Charlie | 2023 Birmingham | 01:06:00 | |
| Carroll Ken | 2024 Malaga | 01:05:51 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 London | 01:10:07 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
