Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire O'Hagan Jonathan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights O'Hagan Jonathan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the O'Hagan Jonathan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve O'Hagan Jonathan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:59. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:06 | 45:49 to 43:43 | 70.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:34 | 05:34 to 05:00 | 19.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:19 | 05:48 to 05:29 | 10.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:29 to 04:29 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:38 to 02:38 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:37 to 04:37 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:06 to 02:06 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:34 to 04:34 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:57 to 05:57 | 0.0% |
| O'Hagan Jonathan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:49 | 00:00 | 04:46 +01:03 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:29 | 05:49 | 04:31 -00:02 | 04:46 +01:03 |
| Running 2 | 05:04 | 10:18 | 05:08 -00:04 | 09:17 +01:01 |
| Sled Push | 02:38 | 15:22 | 03:04 -00:26 | 14:25 +00:57 |
| Running 3 | 05:22 | 18:00 | 05:37 -00:15 | 17:29 +00:31 |
| Sled Pull | 05:34 | 23:22 | 05:14 +00:20 | 23:06 +00:16 |
| Running 4 | 05:33 | 28:56 | 05:36 -00:03 | 28:20 +00:36 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:48 | 34:29 | 05:45 +00:03 | 33:56 +00:33 |
| Running 5 | 07:09 | 40:17 | 05:47 +01:22 | 39:41 +00:36 |
| Rowing | 04:37 | 47:26 | 04:54 -00:17 | 45:28 +01:58 |
| Running 6 | 05:23 | 52:03 | 05:37 -00:14 | 50:22 +01:41 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:06 | 57:26 | 02:17 -00:11 | 55:59 +01:27 |
| Running 7 | 05:22 | 59:32 | 05:36 -00:14 | 58:16 +01:16 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:34 | 01:04:54 | 05:28 -00:54 | 01:03:52 +01:02 |
| Running 8 | 06:10 | 01:09:28 | 06:18 -00:08 | 01:09:20 +00:08 |
| Wall Balls | 05:57 | 01:15:38 | 06:57 -01:00 | 01:15:38 +00:00 |
| Roxzone | 08:34 | 01:30:01 | 07:26 +01:08 | 01:30:01 |
Jonathan O'Hagan competed in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX event and finished in the top 41% of all athletes and top 40% of his age group (40-44). He demonstrated a balanced performance, excelling in both strength and running exercises. However, the analysis of his total running time indicates that there is room for improvement in his running performance, as he was slower than average. This suggests that Jonathan has a stronger profile in strength exercises. His pacing during the race seemed inconsistent, with a slower start in the first running segment, but an improvement in the subsequent segments. This pattern suggests that he may have started too slow and could benefit from a more aggressive start in future races.
Based on Jonathan's performance, the following strategies could be implemented in future races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Niessen Philipp | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:29:32 | |
| Hope Guy | 2023 Birmingham | 01:30:22 | |
| O'Hehir Stephen | 2024 Melbourne | 01:30:18 | |
| Gilbert Michael | 2024 Perth | 01:30:08 | |
| Kucharski Daniel | 2024 Poznan | 01:30:30 | |
| Panepinto Joseph | 2024 New York | 01:30:12 | |
| Howe Cameron | 2024 Birmingham | 01:30:29 | |
| Retschlag Kay | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:30:26 | |
| Mersch Thierry | 2019 Oberhausen | 01:29:57 | |
| Bull Matthew | 2023 London | 01:29:50 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 London | 01:22:37 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
