Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Poznan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Nepelski Krzysztof's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Nepelski Krzysztof's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Nepelski Krzysztof's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Nepelski Krzysztof's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:09. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:00 | 43:26 to 39:26 | 77.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:45 | 05:15 to 04:30 | 14.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:07 | 04:23 to 04:16 | 2.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:06 | 04:21 to 04:15 | 1.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:06 | 04:32 to 04:26 | 1.9% |
| Rowing | 00:05 | 04:41 to 04:36 | 1.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:43 to 01:43 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:51 to 01:51 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:20 to 04:20 | 0.0% |
| Nepelski Krzysztof | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:16 | 00:00 | 04:22 +00:54 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:23 | 05:16 | 04:21 +00:02 | 04:22 +00:54 |
| Running 2 | 04:51 | 09:39 | 04:44 +00:07 | 08:43 +00:56 |
| Sled Push | 01:43 | 14:30 | 02:44 -01:01 | 13:27 +01:03 |
| Running 3 | 05:13 | 16:13 | 05:07 +00:06 | 16:11 +00:02 |
| Sled Pull | 04:21 | 21:26 | 04:35 -00:14 | 21:18 +00:08 |
| Running 4 | 05:34 | 25:47 | 05:06 +00:28 | 25:53 -00:06 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:15 | 31:21 | 04:54 +00:21 | 30:59 +00:22 |
| Running 5 | 05:30 | 36:36 | 05:15 +00:15 | 35:53 +00:43 |
| Rowing | 04:41 | 42:06 | 04:41 +00:00 | 41:08 +00:58 |
| Running 6 | 05:22 | 46:47 | 05:08 +00:14 | 45:49 +00:58 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:51 | 52:09 | 02:04 -00:13 | 50:57 +01:12 |
| Running 7 | 05:37 | 54:00 | 05:07 +00:30 | 53:01 +00:59 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:32 | 59:37 | 04:45 -00:13 | 58:08 +01:29 |
| Running 8 | 06:05 | 01:04:09 | 05:35 +00:30 | 01:02:53 +01:16 |
| Wall Balls | 04:20 | 01:10:14 | 05:58 -01:38 | 01:08:28 +01:46 |
| Roxzone | 06:12 | 01:20:40 | 06:14 -00:02 | 01:20:40 |
Considering Krzysztof's performance in the 2024 Poznan HYROX race, we can identify a few key areas that illustrate his strengths and areas for improvement. Krzysztof finished in the top 38% of 774 athletes overall and in the top 37% of his age group, which is a commendable performance.
Looking at his overall time of 01:20:40, we can deduce that he has a fairly balanced performance in both the running and strength components of the race, but with a slight tendency towards strength. His total running time was 00:43:26, which is 02:47 slower than the average. This indicates that he could benefit from focusing more on his running performance in future training.
From the first four running segments, it's clear that Krzysztof tends to start at a slower pace compared to the average. This pacing strategy could be further optimized to ensure a more efficient distribution of energy throughout the race.
For better race performance, Krzysztof could consider implementing the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gashi Blerim | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:20:21 | |
| Leone Thomas | 2024 Houston | 01:20:10 | |
| Springer Jim | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:20:38 | |
| Raaijmakers Rocky | 2024 Maastricht | 01:20:13 | |
| Bendavid Dor | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:21:04 | |
| Van Den Berg Mark | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:20:11 | |
| Bijl Evert | 2021 Amsterdam | 01:20:25 | |
| Moinet Julien | 2024 Perth | 01:20:14 | |
| Taylor Geoffrey | 2024 Perth | 01:20:33 | |
| Pyett Leyton | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:20:59 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Gdansk | 01:20:37 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
