Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Denwood Thomas's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Denwood Thomas's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Denwood Thomas's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Denwood Thomas's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:39. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:28 | 07:00 to 05:32 | 55.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:21 | 05:36 to 05:15 | 13.2% |
| Rowing | 00:19 | 05:11 to 04:52 | 11.9% |
| Run Total | 00:17 | 44:11 to 43:54 | 10.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:14 | 03:11 to 02:57 | 8.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:29 to 04:29 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:56 to 04:56 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:05 to 02:05 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:55 to 05:55 | 0.0% |
| Denwood Thomas | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:30 | 00:00 | 04:46 +00:44 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:29 | 05:30 | 04:31 -00:02 | 04:46 +00:44 |
| Running 2 | 04:56 | 09:59 | 05:10 -00:14 | 09:17 +00:42 |
| Sled Push | 03:11 | 14:55 | 03:04 +00:07 | 14:27 +00:28 |
| Running 3 | 05:31 | 18:06 | 05:39 -00:08 | 17:31 +00:35 |
| Sled Pull | 04:56 | 23:37 | 05:16 -00:20 | 23:10 +00:27 |
| Running 4 | 05:36 | 28:33 | 05:38 -00:02 | 28:26 +00:07 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:00 | 34:09 | 05:49 +01:11 | 34:04 +00:05 |
| Running 5 | 05:35 | 41:09 | 05:50 -00:15 | 39:53 +01:16 |
| Rowing | 05:11 | 46:44 | 04:56 +00:15 | 45:43 +01:01 |
| Running 6 | 05:26 | 51:55 | 05:40 -00:14 | 50:39 +01:16 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:05 | 57:21 | 02:18 -00:13 | 56:19 +01:02 |
| Running 7 | 05:25 | 59:26 | 05:39 -00:14 | 58:37 +00:49 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:36 | 01:04:51 | 05:30 +00:06 | 01:04:16 +00:35 |
| Running 8 | 06:16 | 01:10:27 | 06:22 -00:06 | 01:09:46 +00:41 |
| Wall Balls | 05:55 | 01:16:43 | 07:02 -01:07 | 01:16:08 +00:35 |
| Roxzone | 08:14 | 01:30:42 | 07:32 +00:42 | 01:30:42 |
Thomas Denwood demonstrated a commendable performance in this race, placing in the top 42% of all athletes and in the top 45% of his age group. His overall time of 01:30:42 is reflective of his competitive spirit and dedication to fitness. It is noteworthy that Thomas's total running time of 00:44:11 is 00:49 faster than the average, indicating a strong runner profile. Despite a slow start in the first running segment, he managed to maintain a consistent pace and even exceed the average time in most of the subsequent running segments. This shows that Thomas is a resilient athlete who can adjust his pacing effectively during the race.
Overall, Thomas should consider implementing the following strategies to improve his performance in future races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Jonid Ahsik | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:30:29 | |
| Serrano Diego | 2024 Madrid | 01:30:19 | |
| Turner Sam | 2023 London | 01:31:07 | |
| van Tongerlo Djarno | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:31:03 | |
| Schouwvlieger Daniel | 2024 Maastricht | 01:30:50 | |
| Schießer Stefan | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:30:34 | |
| Bardet Giovanni | 2024 Marseille | 01:30:57 | |
| Faltin Stefan | 2024 Stockholm | 01:31:01 | |
| 신 정환 | 2024 Incheon | 01:30:37 | |
| Kucharski Daniel | 2024 Poznan | 01:30:30 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
