Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Madrid using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Bracken John's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Bracken John's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Bracken John's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Bracken John's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:15. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:22 | 07:28 to 06:06 | 42.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:57 | 06:40 to 05:43 | 29.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:32 | 05:08 to 04:36 | 16.4% |
| Rowing | 00:19 | 05:19 to 05:00 | 9.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:05 | 03:17 to 03:12 | 2.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:12 to 05:12 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:04 to 02:04 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:58 to 06:58 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 46:03 to 46:03 | 0.0% |
| Bracken John | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:28 | 00:00 | 04:59 +01:29 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:08 | 06:28 | 04:37 +00:31 | 04:59 +01:29 |
| Running 2 | 05:15 | 11:36 | 05:25 -00:10 | 09:36 +02:00 |
| Sled Push | 03:17 | 16:51 | 03:15 +00:02 | 15:01 +01:50 |
| Running 3 | 05:31 | 20:08 | 05:59 -00:28 | 18:16 +01:52 |
| Sled Pull | 05:12 | 25:39 | 05:39 -00:27 | 24:15 +01:24 |
| Running 4 | 05:46 | 30:51 | 05:56 -00:10 | 29:54 +00:57 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:28 | 36:37 | 06:21 +01:07 | 35:50 +00:47 |
| Running 5 | 05:47 | 44:05 | 06:10 -00:23 | 42:11 +01:54 |
| Rowing | 05:19 | 49:52 | 05:03 +00:16 | 48:21 +01:31 |
| Running 6 | 05:20 | 55:11 | 05:59 -00:39 | 53:24 +01:47 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:04 | 01:00:31 | 02:25 -00:21 | 59:23 +01:08 |
| Running 7 | 05:22 | 01:02:35 | 05:57 -00:35 | 01:01:48 +00:47 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:40 | 01:07:57 | 05:55 +00:45 | 01:07:45 +00:12 |
| Running 8 | 06:37 | 01:14:37 | 06:51 -00:14 | 01:13:40 +00:57 |
| Wall Balls | 06:58 | 01:21:14 | 07:42 -00:44 | 01:20:31 +00:43 |
| Roxzone | 08:23 | 01:36:27 | 08:14 +00:09 | 01:36:27 |
John Bracken's performance in the 2024 Madrid Hyrox race was commendable. He ranked in the top 51% of all 1509 athletes, and within his age group of 30-34, he was in the top 55% of 363 athletes – a noteworthy achievement. His overall time was 01:36:27, with a total running time of 00:46:03, which was 01:28 faster than the average running time. This suggests that John has a runner profile and his strength lies in running. However, his initial pace in the race (Running 1) was slower than the average, indicating a slower start, but he was able to make up for this in the later stages, showing good stamina and endurance.
John should consider working on the following strategies for better performance in future races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Duffy Nathan | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:36:31 | |
| Auerhammer Klaus | 2019 Karlsruhe | 01:36:55 | |
| Berrocal Darien | 2023 Madrid | 01:36:30 | |
| Elmi Feisal | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:36:55 | |
| Longley Guy | 2023 London | 01:36:16 | |
| Brown Peter | 2024 Stockholm | 01:36:30 | |
| Cervenak Rastislav | 2024 Malaga | 01:36:10 | |
| Olver Adam | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:36:20 | |
| Duitman Therry | 2022 Maastricht | 01:36:39 | |
| Nelson Skylar | 2023 Anaheim | 01:36:11 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
