Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Rotterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Verweij Hans's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Verweij Hans's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Verweij Hans's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Verweij Hans's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:56. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:15 | 42:24 to 41:09 | 42.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:37 | 05:21 to 04:44 | 21.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:25 | 04:58 to 04:33 | 14.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:14 | 05:07 to 04:53 | 8.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:09 | 04:30 to 04:21 | 5.1% |
| Rowing | 00:08 | 04:50 to 04:42 | 4.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:05 | 02:06 to 02:01 | 2.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:03 | 02:42 to 02:39 | 1.7% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:38 to 05:38 | 0.0% |
| Verweij Hans | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:58 | 00:00 | 04:34 +00:24 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:30 | 04:58 | 04:25 +00:05 | 04:34 +00:24 |
| Running 2 | 04:47 | 09:28 | 04:54 -00:07 | 08:59 +00:29 |
| Sled Push | 02:42 | 14:15 | 02:52 -00:10 | 13:53 +00:22 |
| Running 3 | 05:10 | 16:57 | 05:21 -00:11 | 16:45 +00:12 |
| Sled Pull | 04:58 | 22:07 | 04:51 +00:07 | 22:06 +00:01 |
| Running 4 | 05:23 | 27:05 | 05:19 +00:04 | 26:57 +00:08 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:07 | 32:28 | 05:12 -00:05 | 32:16 +00:12 |
| Running 5 | 05:36 | 37:35 | 05:29 +00:07 | 37:28 +00:07 |
| Rowing | 04:50 | 43:11 | 04:47 +00:03 | 42:57 +00:14 |
| Running 6 | 05:30 | 48:01 | 05:20 +00:10 | 47:44 +00:17 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:06 | 53:31 | 02:08 -00:02 | 53:04 +00:27 |
| Running 7 | 05:21 | 55:37 | 05:19 +00:02 | 55:12 +00:25 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:21 | 01:00:58 | 04:59 +00:22 | 01:00:31 +00:27 |
| Running 8 | 05:43 | 01:06:19 | 05:54 -00:11 | 01:05:30 +00:49 |
| Wall Balls | 05:38 | 01:12:02 | 06:19 -00:41 | 01:11:24 +00:38 |
| Roxzone | 06:51 | 01:24:22 | 06:39 +00:12 | 01:24:22 |
Hans Verweij showed a commendable performance in the 2024 Rotterdam Hyrox race, finishing in the top 24% of his age group and the top 20% overall among 1965 athletes. His total running time was notably 00:11 faster than average, indicating a strong runner profile. However, his performance in the roxzone segment suggests a need for improved fitness and transition efficiency. Hans demonstrated a hybrid profile but with a slight inclination towards running. His pacing appeared to start off slower in the initial running segment but improved as the race progressed, showcasing his ability to manage and distribute his energy effectively throughout the race.
By addressing these specific areas and implementing the suggested strategies and exercises, Hans Verweij has the potential to significantly improve his performance in future Hyrox races. Continuous assessment and adjustment of training plans will be key to his success.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Schunack Martin | 2019 Hannover | 01:24:41 | |
| Wright Broc | 2024 Brisbane | 01:24:04 | |
| Daub Dan | 2022 Chicago | 01:24:02 | |
| Loranger Tommy | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:23:55 | |
| Manassero Davis | 2024 Turin | 01:24:22 | |
| Mazur Grzegorz | 2024 Gdansk | 01:24:47 | |
| Tijhof Thijmen | 2024 Maastricht | 01:24:21 | |
| Hague Tobias | 2022 London | 01:24:13 | |
| Van Geuns Jan Michiel | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:24:12 | |
| Donohue Ryan | 2023 Manchester | 01:23:55 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Amsterdam | 01:14:18 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
