Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2019 Karlsruhe using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Hanf Andreas's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hanf Andreas's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hanf Andreas's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hanf Andreas's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:01. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:37 | 07:57 to 06:20 | 53.6% |
| Wall Balls | 01:11 | 08:47 to 07:36 | 39.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:13 | 02:40 to 02:27 | 7.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:39 to 04:39 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:44 to 02:44 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:24 to 05:24 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:49 to 04:49 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:08 to 05:08 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 47:00 to 47:00 | 0.0% |
| Hanf Andreas | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:54 | 00:00 | 05:05 -00:11 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:39 | 04:54 | 04:38 +00:01 | 05:05 -00:11 |
| Running 2 | 05:27 | 09:33 | 05:32 -00:05 | 09:43 -00:10 |
| Sled Push | 02:44 | 15:00 | 03:21 -00:37 | 15:15 -00:15 |
| Running 3 | 05:50 | 17:44 | 06:05 -00:15 | 18:36 -00:52 |
| Sled Pull | 05:24 | 23:34 | 05:48 -00:24 | 24:41 -01:07 |
| Running 4 | 05:46 | 28:58 | 06:02 -00:16 | 30:29 -01:31 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:57 | 34:44 | 06:35 +01:22 | 36:31 -01:47 |
| Running 5 | 05:57 | 42:41 | 06:18 -00:21 | 43:06 -00:25 |
| Rowing | 04:49 | 48:38 | 05:06 -00:17 | 49:24 -00:46 |
| Running 6 | 06:01 | 53:27 | 06:08 -00:07 | 54:30 -01:03 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:40 | 59:28 | 02:30 +00:10 | 01:00:38 -01:10 |
| Running 7 | 05:49 | 01:02:08 | 06:05 -00:16 | 01:03:08 -01:00 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:08 | 01:07:57 | 06:10 -01:02 | 01:09:13 -01:16 |
| Running 8 | 07:19 | 01:13:05 | 07:04 +00:15 | 01:15:23 -02:18 |
| Wall Balls | 08:47 | 01:20:24 | 07:55 +00:52 | 01:22:27 -02:03 |
| Roxzone | 09:49 | 01:38:52 | 08:30 +01:19 | 01:38:52 |
Hanf's total running time of 00:47:00 was 01:05 slower than the average, indicating that he could benefit from improving his running fitness. However, it is worth noting that his best running lap of 00:04:54 was only 00:04 slower than the average, suggesting that he has the potential to excel in this area.
Overall, Andreas Hanf has shown potential in both running and strength-based segments. By focusing on the identified areas of improvement and implementing the suggested training strategies, he can enhance his performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hancox Andy | 2024 London | 01:38:44 | |
| Meyer Alexander | 2020 Hannover | 01:39:08 | |
| Rocher Quentin | 2024 Paris | 01:38:25 | |
| Benassi Alessandro | 2019 Nürnberg | 01:38:58 | |
| Jung Adrian | 2022 Karlsruhe | 01:38:56 | |
| Abeln Hendrik | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:38:30 | |
| Albright Matt | 2024 New York | 01:38:25 | |
| Neukamm Yannick | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:38:44 | |
| Carr Chris | 2023 Dublin | 01:38:42 | |
| Broughton Adam | 2022 Dallas | 01:38:57 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
