Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Flint Malcolm's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Flint Malcolm's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Flint Malcolm's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Flint Malcolm's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 09:51. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 09:36 | 49:23 to 39:47 | 97.5% |
| Rowing | 00:09 | 04:46 to 04:37 | 1.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:06 | 02:01 to 01:55 | 1.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:11 to 04:11 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:45 to 01:45 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:46 to 03:46 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:02 to 04:02 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:14 to 03:14 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 02:50 to 02:50 | 0.0% |
| Flint Malcolm | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:53 | 00:00 | 04:28 +01:25 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:11 | 05:53 | 04:23 -00:12 | 04:28 +01:25 |
| Running 2 | 05:57 | 10:04 | 04:46 +01:11 | 08:51 +01:13 |
| Sled Push | 01:45 | 16:01 | 02:46 -01:01 | 13:37 +02:24 |
| Running 3 | 06:06 | 17:46 | 05:10 +00:56 | 16:23 +01:23 |
| Sled Pull | 03:46 | 23:52 | 04:40 -00:54 | 21:33 +02:19 |
| Running 4 | 06:02 | 27:38 | 05:08 +00:54 | 26:13 +01:25 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:02 | 33:40 | 04:57 -00:55 | 31:21 +02:19 |
| Running 5 | 06:20 | 37:42 | 05:17 +01:03 | 36:18 +01:24 |
| Rowing | 04:46 | 44:02 | 04:43 +00:03 | 41:35 +02:27 |
| Running 6 | 06:20 | 48:48 | 05:11 +01:09 | 46:18 +02:30 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:01 | 55:08 | 02:05 -00:04 | 51:29 +03:39 |
| Running 7 | 06:08 | 57:09 | 05:09 +00:59 | 53:34 +03:35 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:14 | 01:03:17 | 04:50 -01:36 | 58:43 +04:34 |
| Running 8 | 06:39 | 01:06:31 | 05:40 +00:59 | 01:03:33 +02:58 |
| Wall Balls | 02:50 | 01:13:10 | 06:05 -03:15 | 01:09:13 +03:57 |
| Roxzone | 05:44 | 01:21:38 | 06:20 -00:36 | 01:21:38 |
However, there are areas where Malcolm can improve to enhance his performance further. His total running time of 00:49:23 is 10:00 slower than the average, indicating that he may need to focus on improving his running abilities and overall fitness. It is important for him to work on his transition time in the roxzone as well, as he took more time than the average athlete, indicating a potential need for improved overall fitness and quicker transitions.
In conclusion, Malcolm Flint's performance in the Hyrox race was commendable, placing him in the top percentage of athletes in his age group. By focusing on improving his running speed, endurance, and overall fitness, Malcolm can further enhance his performance in future races. Implementing specific training strategies, such as interval training, tempo runs, and strength exercises, will help him reach his goals and improve his performance in the identified areas of improvement. With proper pacing and efficient transitions, Malcolm has the potential to achieve even better results in his next race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Fotherby Alex | 2024 Birmingham | 01:21:54 | |
| Carr Simon | 2022 London | 01:21:14 | |
| Marko Florian | 2023 Wien | 01:21:09 | |
| Mcdowall Mark | 2024 Melbourne | 01:22:03 | |
| Fortunato Duarte Matias | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:21:21 | |
| Klein Norbert | 2023 Köln | 01:21:43 | |
| Thomas Dan | 2024 Manchester | 01:21:56 | |
| Perillo Salvatore | 2024 Milan | 01:22:03 | |
| Testa Matteo | 2023 Paris | 01:21:13 | |
| Moore Richard | 2022 London | 01:22:08 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Birmingham | 01:40:52 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
