Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Cape Town using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Engelbrecht Sj's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Engelbrecht Sj's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Engelbrecht Sj's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Engelbrecht Sj's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:34. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 06:28 | 46:46 to 40:18 | 98.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:06 | 02:03 to 01:57 | 1.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:13 to 04:13 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:22 to 01:22 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:31 to 03:31 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:15 to 04:15 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:37 to 04:37 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:04 to 04:04 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:32 to 04:32 | 0.0% |
| Engelbrecht Sj | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:34 | 00:00 | 04:29 +01:05 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:13 | 05:34 | 04:24 -00:11 | 04:29 +01:05 |
| Running 2 | 05:23 | 09:47 | 04:50 +00:33 | 08:53 +00:54 |
| Sled Push | 01:22 | 15:10 | 02:49 -01:27 | 13:43 +01:27 |
| Running 3 | 05:40 | 16:32 | 05:13 +00:27 | 16:32 +00:00 |
| Sled Pull | 03:31 | 22:12 | 04:44 -01:13 | 21:45 +00:27 |
| Running 4 | 05:45 | 25:43 | 05:12 +00:33 | 26:29 -00:46 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:15 | 31:28 | 05:01 -00:46 | 31:41 -00:13 |
| Running 5 | 06:14 | 35:43 | 05:21 +00:53 | 36:42 -00:59 |
| Rowing | 04:37 | 41:57 | 04:44 -00:07 | 42:03 -00:06 |
| Running 6 | 05:47 | 46:34 | 05:14 +00:33 | 46:47 -00:13 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:03 | 52:21 | 02:07 -00:04 | 52:01 +00:20 |
| Running 7 | 05:50 | 54:24 | 05:13 +00:37 | 54:08 +00:16 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:04 | 01:00:14 | 04:52 -00:48 | 59:21 +00:53 |
| Running 8 | 06:38 | 01:04:18 | 05:43 +00:55 | 01:04:13 +00:05 |
| Wall Balls | 04:32 | 01:10:56 | 06:14 -01:42 | 01:09:56 +01:00 |
| Roxzone | 07:17 | 01:22:34 | 06:24 +00:53 | 01:22:34 |
Sj Engelbrecht delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Cape Town Hyrox race, securing an overall rank of 86, placing him in the top 21% of all competitors. In his age group, he ranked 29th, demonstrating a strong competitive edge. Notably, his performance in strength-based exercises such as the Sled Push and Wall Balls was outstanding, ranking in the 1st and 4th percentiles, respectively. However, his overall running time was 5:10 slower than average, indicating a need for improvement in this area. The pacing analysis suggests that Engelbrecht started the race slower than average, as indicated by the slower times in the initial running segments. His profile leans towards strength, as he excelled in strength exercises but lagged in running.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Bousquet Alvarez Lucas | 2023 Bilbao | 01:22:41 | |
| Héricy Alexandre | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:22:38 | |
| Barrowman John | 2023 Dubai | 01:22:12 | |
| Kupferman Lee | 2023 London | 01:22:25 | |
| Chandler Justin | 2022 Chicago | 01:22:10 | |
| Coughlan Barry | 2024 Dublin | 01:22:15 | |
| Seon David | 2022 Karlsruhe | 01:22:18 | |
| Amin Prash | 2023 Madrid | 01:22:46 | |
| Lum Rafael | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:22:30 | |
| Denton Tobin | 2024 Birmingham | 01:22:32 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
