Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Chicago using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:48. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:23 (From 52:36 to 47:13) | 92.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:25 (From 03:43 to 03:18) | 7.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 (From 04:11 to 04:11) | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 (From 04:57 to 04:57) | 0.0% |
| BBJ | 00:00 (From 04:22 to 04:22) | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 (From 04:52 to 04:52) | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 (From 02:13 to 02:13) | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 (From 05:19 to 05:19) | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 (From 06:46 to 06:46) | 0.0% |
| Cleghorn Jason | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:14 | 00:00 | 05:03 -00:49 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:11 | 04:14 | 04:38 -00:27 | 05:03 -00:49 |
| Running 2 | 06:23 | 08:25 | 05:30 +00:53 | 09:41 -01:16 |
| Sled Push | 03:43 | 14:48 | 03:18 +00:25 | 15:11 -00:23 |
| Running 3 | 07:15 | 18:31 | 06:02 +01:13 | 18:29 +00:02 |
| Sled Pull | 04:57 | 25:46 | 05:46 -00:49 | 24:31 +01:15 |
| Running 4 | 06:49 | 30:43 | 06:01 +00:48 | 30:17 +00:26 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:22 | 37:32 | 06:34 -02:12 | 36:18 +01:14 |
| Running 5 | 07:07 | 41:54 | 06:16 +00:51 | 42:52 -00:58 |
| Rowing | 04:52 | 49:01 | 05:07 -00:15 | 49:08 -00:07 |
| Running 6 | 07:04 | 53:53 | 06:06 +00:58 | 54:15 -00:22 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:13 | 01:00:57 | 02:30 -00:17 | 01:00:21 +00:36 |
| Running 7 | 06:19 | 01:03:10 | 06:04 +00:15 | 01:02:51 +00:19 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:19 | 01:09:29 | 06:09 -00:50 | 01:08:55 +00:34 |
| Running 8 | 07:28 | 01:14:48 | 07:04 +00:24 | 01:15:04 -00:16 |
| Wall Balls | 06:46 | 01:22:16 | 07:51 -01:05 | 01:22:08 +00:08 |
| Roxzone | 09:30 | 01:38:25 | 08:26 +01:04 | 01:38:25 |
Jason's best running lap was 00:04:14, which was 00:34 faster than the average. His splits analysis reveals that he performed above average in certain segments, such as Ski Erg, Sled Pull, Burpees Broad Jump, Farmers Carry, Sandbag Lunges, Wall Balls, and Rowing. However, he struggled in segments such as Running 2, Running 3, Running 4, Running 5, Running 6, Running 7, and Running 8, where he was consistently slower than the average. His Roxzone time was 00:09:30, which was 01:06 slower than the average.
To improve his performance in these segments, Jason should focus on the following training strategies and techniques:
1. Running 3: Jason was 01:13 slower than the average in this segment. To improve his running speed and endurance, he should incorporate interval training into his routine. This can include high-intensity intervals, such as sprinting for 30 seconds followed by a 1-minute recovery jog. Additionally, he should work on his running form and technique, focusing on maintaining a consistent pace and efficient stride.
2. Roxzone: Jason's Roxzone time was 01:06 slower than the average, indicating that he may have rested more or taken longer transitions between exercises. To improve this segment, Jason should focus on improving his overall fitness and conditioning. This can be achieved through regular cardiovascular exercises, such as running, cycling, or swimming. He should also practice faster transitions between exercises during his training sessions.
3. Running 2, Running 6, Running 5, Running 4, Running 8, and Running 7: Jason consistently performed slower than the average in these running segments. To improve his running performance, he should incorporate both strength and endurance training. This can include exercises such as hill sprints, tempo runs, and long-distance runs. Additionally, he should work on strengthening his leg muscles through exercises such as squats, lunges, and plyometric exercises.
In conclusion, Jason Cleghorn had a solid performance in the 2023 Chicago Hyrox race. While he performed well in certain segments, there is room for improvement in others. By focusing on specific training strategies and techniques, as well as implementing race strategies, Jason can enhance his performance in the identified areas and achieve better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Stokes Gavin | 2024 Birmingham | 01:38:48 | |
| Mathieson Rhys | 2023 Melbourne | 01:38:16 | |
| Holcroft Alex | 2024 Birmingham | 01:38:50 | |
| Gilbert Ian | 2024 Birmingham | 01:38:32 | |
| Akbaba Grkan | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:38:25 | |
| Errigo Alberto | 2024 Melbourne | 01:38:02 | |
| Beech Jack | 2023 Melbourne | 01:38:27 | |
| Wiens Dmitrij | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:38:12 | |
| Cozier Hallam | 2024 London | 01:38:07 | |
| Bogardus Jordan | 2024 Anaheim | 01:38:16 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Chicago Navy Pier Cleghorn Jason | 01:31:01 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Cleghorn Jason
