Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Arbuckle Grant's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Arbuckle Grant's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Arbuckle Grant's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Arbuckle Grant's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:25. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 01:57 | 06:57 to 05:00 | 44.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:52 | 06:05 to 05:13 | 19.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:42 | 02:53 to 02:11 | 15.8% |
| Wall Balls | 00:28 | 07:04 to 06:36 | 10.6% |
| Rowing | 00:20 | 05:11 to 04:51 | 7.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:06 | 04:35 to 04:29 | 2.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:37 to 02:37 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:50 to 04:50 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 42:45 to 42:45 | 0.0% |
| Arbuckle Grant | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:43 | 00:00 | 04:45 -00:02 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:35 | 04:43 | 04:31 +00:04 | 04:45 -00:02 |
| Running 2 | 04:59 | 09:18 | 05:08 -00:09 | 09:16 +00:02 |
| Sled Push | 02:37 | 14:17 | 03:05 -00:28 | 14:24 -00:07 |
| Running 3 | 05:48 | 16:54 | 05:37 +00:11 | 17:29 -00:35 |
| Sled Pull | 06:57 | 22:42 | 05:15 +01:42 | 23:06 -00:24 |
| Running 4 | 05:29 | 29:39 | 05:37 -00:08 | 28:21 +01:18 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:50 | 35:08 | 05:45 -00:55 | 33:58 +01:10 |
| Running 5 | 05:44 | 39:58 | 05:47 -00:03 | 39:43 +00:15 |
| Rowing | 05:11 | 45:42 | 04:55 +00:16 | 45:30 +00:12 |
| Running 6 | 05:10 | 50:53 | 05:38 -00:28 | 50:25 +00:28 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:53 | 56:03 | 02:17 +00:36 | 56:03 +00:00 |
| Running 7 | 05:11 | 58:56 | 05:37 -00:26 | 58:20 +00:36 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:05 | 01:04:07 | 05:28 +00:37 | 01:03:57 +00:10 |
| Running 8 | 05:44 | 01:10:12 | 06:19 -00:35 | 01:09:25 +00:47 |
| Wall Balls | 07:04 | 01:15:56 | 06:58 +00:06 | 01:15:44 +00:12 |
| Roxzone | 07:16 | 01:30:09 | 07:27 -00:11 | 01:30:09 |
Grant Arbuckle completed the Melbourne Hyrox race with an overall time of 01:30:09, placing him in the top 37% of all competitors and the top 38% in his age group. His total running time was 00:42:45, which is 02:05 faster than the average, indicating a strong running profile. Grant performed particularly well in several running segments, suggesting he has a solid running base. However, his performance in strength-based exercises, such as the Sled Pull, Sandbag Lunges, and Farmers Carry, indicates room for improvement. His pacing pattern shows a steady start with improving performance in later running segments, suggesting he may benefit from a more aggressive start.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hamblin Alex | 2023 London | 01:30:31 | |
| Schmitt Tim | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:30:17 | |
| O'Hehir Stephen | 2024 Melbourne | 01:30:18 | |
| Birnstingl Philipp | 2023 München | 01:29:48 | |
| Roes Martijn | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:29:39 | |
| Moreiko Frank | 2024 Berlin | 01:29:54 | |
| Houtman Boy | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:29:53 | |
| Muster Steve | 2022 Wien | 01:30:00 | |
| Sugai Marcel Jundi | 2023 München | 01:30:28 | |
| Van Cappellen Stan | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:30:04 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
