Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Chicago Navy Pier using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Allez Arthur's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Allez Arthur's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Allez Arthur's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Allez Arthur's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:25. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:24 | 07:12 to 05:48 | 31.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:22 | 06:08 to 04:46 | 30.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:47 | 03:23 to 02:36 | 17.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:46 | 05:24 to 04:38 | 17.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:05 | 04:25 to 04:20 | 1.9% |
| Rowing | 00:01 | 04:41 to 04:40 | 0.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:11 to 04:11 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:59 to 01:59 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 39:30 to 39:30 | 0.0% |
| Allez Arthur | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:49 | 00:00 | 04:31 -00:42 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:25 | 03:49 | 04:24 +00:01 | 04:31 -00:42 |
| Running 2 | 05:17 | 08:14 | 04:52 +00:25 | 08:55 -00:41 |
| Sled Push | 03:23 | 13:31 | 02:51 +00:32 | 13:47 -00:16 |
| Running 3 | 05:12 | 16:54 | 05:17 -00:05 | 16:38 +00:16 |
| Sled Pull | 04:11 | 22:06 | 04:47 -00:36 | 21:55 +00:11 |
| Running 4 | 05:05 | 26:17 | 05:15 -00:10 | 26:42 -00:25 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:08 | 31:22 | 05:04 +01:04 | 31:57 -00:35 |
| Running 5 | 05:14 | 37:30 | 05:25 -00:11 | 37:01 +00:29 |
| Rowing | 04:41 | 42:44 | 04:45 -00:04 | 42:26 +00:18 |
| Running 6 | 05:05 | 47:25 | 05:17 -00:12 | 47:11 +00:14 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:59 | 52:30 | 02:08 -00:09 | 52:28 +00:02 |
| Running 7 | 04:56 | 54:29 | 05:16 -00:20 | 54:36 -00:07 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:24 | 59:25 | 04:55 +00:29 | 59:52 -00:27 |
| Running 8 | 04:55 | 01:04:49 | 05:49 -00:54 | 01:04:47 +00:02 |
| Wall Balls | 07:12 | 01:09:44 | 06:17 +00:55 | 01:10:36 -00:52 |
| Roxzone | 06:33 | 01:23:22 | 06:29 +00:04 | 01:23:22 |
Arthur Allez has demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Chicago Navy Pier Event. His overall rank positions him in the top 22% of all athletes, a notable achievement. Arthur's total running time was 02:24 faster than average, indicating a strong runner profile. His performance in the first four running segments show that he started the race quite fast, which may indicate an area for pacing improvement.
Incorporating a strategic approach to pacing can significantly improve Arthur's performance. As his running segments were generally faster than average, he could focus on starting the race at a slightly slower pace, saving energy for the more strength-demanding segments towards the end of the race. Additionally, improving his transitions between segments could shave off valuable seconds from his overall time. Lastly, focusing on his form and technique during the strength segments could help him maintain a steady pace and prevent unnecessary fatigue, resulting in improved performance and possibly a better overall time.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Coulonge Thibaud | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:23:46 | |
| Ziegenthaler Uli | 2022 Leipzig | 01:23:39 | |
| Flegg Harry | 2024 Glasgow | 01:23:37 | |
| Kolijn Patrick | 2024 Maastricht | 01:23:18 | |
| Lenormand David | 2024 Melbourne | 01:23:44 | |
| Colasante Giorgio | 2024 Rimini | 01:23:17 | |
| Brodersen Andreas | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:23:15 | |
| Lottermann Paul | 2019 Hamburg | 01:22:59 | |
| Pathak Sanjeev | 2024 Berlin | 01:23:26 | |
| Van Vossen Lars | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:23:04 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
