Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Bremen using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Wippersteg Michael's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Wippersteg Michael's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Wippersteg Michael's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Wippersteg Michael's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:55. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:26 | 42:52 to 39:26 | 58.0% |
| Sled Push | 01:16 | 03:44 to 02:28 | 21.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:56 | 05:26 to 04:30 | 15.8% |
| Wall Balls | 00:10 | 05:40 to 05:30 | 2.8% |
| Rowing | 00:04 | 04:40 to 04:36 | 1.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:03 | 04:29 to 04:26 | 0.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:15 to 04:15 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:51 to 03:51 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:34 to 01:34 | 0.0% |
| Wippersteg Michael | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:35 | 00:00 | 04:26 +00:09 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:15 | 04:35 | 04:22 -00:07 | 04:26 +00:09 |
| Running 2 | 05:17 | 08:50 | 04:46 +00:31 | 08:48 +00:02 |
| Sled Push | 03:44 | 14:07 | 02:45 +00:59 | 13:34 +00:33 |
| Running 3 | 05:22 | 17:51 | 05:09 +00:13 | 16:19 +01:32 |
| Sled Pull | 03:51 | 23:13 | 04:39 -00:48 | 21:28 +01:45 |
| Running 4 | 05:26 | 27:04 | 05:07 +00:19 | 26:07 +00:57 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:26 | 32:30 | 04:56 +00:30 | 31:14 +01:16 |
| Running 5 | 05:23 | 37:56 | 05:16 +00:07 | 36:10 +01:46 |
| Rowing | 04:40 | 43:19 | 04:42 -00:02 | 41:26 +01:53 |
| Running 6 | 05:31 | 47:59 | 05:10 +00:21 | 46:08 +01:51 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:34 | 53:30 | 02:04 -00:30 | 51:18 +02:12 |
| Running 7 | 05:32 | 55:04 | 05:08 +00:24 | 53:22 +01:42 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:29 | 01:00:36 | 04:48 -00:19 | 58:30 +02:06 |
| Running 8 | 05:49 | 01:05:05 | 05:38 +00:11 | 01:03:18 +01:47 |
| Wall Balls | 05:40 | 01:10:54 | 06:03 -00:23 | 01:08:56 +01:58 |
| Roxzone | 04:51 | 01:21:17 | 06:18 -01:27 | 01:21:17 |
In terms of his splits, Michael had a strong performance in the Ski Erg and Sled Pull segments, where he was faster than the average time. However, he struggled in several running segments, particularly Running 1, Running 2, Running 4, and Running 7, where he was slower than the average time. His best running lap was 00:04:35, which was 00:18 slower than average.
Furthermore, it is important for Michael to consider his profile as a runner with a strength focus. While he performed relatively well in the strength-related segments, he should continue to train his running abilities to maintain a well-rounded performance. Incorporating targeted running workouts and drills into his training routine can help him improve his running speed and endurance.
Overall, with a focus on improving his running performance and addressing the specific areas of improvement highlighted in the splits analysis, Michael Wippersteg can enhance his overall performance in future Hyrox races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Kolbe Jan | 2024 Berlin | 01:20:53 | |
| Buchowicz Dariusz | 2023 Dublin | 01:20:54 | |
| Nicholson Steven | 2024 Dublin | 01:21:26 | |
| Evans Marcus | 2022 Birmingham | 01:21:08 | |
| Faber Quentin | 2024 Paris | 01:21:46 | |
| Plunkett Simon | 2023 London | 01:21:02 | |
| Hogarth Michael | 2023 London | 01:21:32 | |
| Braun Senne | 2021 Amsterdam | 01:20:54 | |
| Hunter Will | 2023 New York | 01:21:03 | |
| Costa Nuno | 2023 Bilbao | 01:21:22 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2021 Amsterdam | 01:24:03 | |
| 2022 Essen | 01:25:05 | |
| 2022 Amsterdam | 01:23:12 | |
| 2022 Las Vegas | 01:34:38 | |
| 2022 Hamburg | 01:23:17 | |
| 2024 Bilbao | 01:36:44 | |
| 2024 Hamburg | 01:29:19 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
