Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Houston using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
1000 similar athletes.
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Run, Baby, Run!
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Station Showdown
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Fast, slow, or steady?
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Expected Finish Time
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station.
Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
Spread of Splits Time
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of
06:44.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance:
Jonathan Wacker demonstrated a commendable effort in the 2024 Houston HYROX, securing a position in the top 43% of all athletes and top 48% in his age group. A notable strength was his performance in the strength-based exercises, particularly the Sled Push and Wall Balls, where he significantly outperformed the average. This suggests a strong base in explosive power and strength. However, his overall running time was slower than average, indicating that while Jonathan has a solid strength foundation, his endurance and running efficiency may need attention. His pacing at the start was slightly faster than average, which could suggest an overly aggressive start impacting his performance in later running segments.
Segments to Improve:
Running (Total Time): Jonathan's total running time was notably slower than the average. To improve, Jonathan should focus on building his aerobic base with long, slow runs, and incorporate interval training to enhance his speed endurance. Specific workouts like 400m repeats at a pace faster than his race pace, with equal rest, could be beneficial. Additionally, incorporating hill sprints will improve his running economy and strength.
Sandbag Lunges: This segment was significantly slower, indicating potential areas for improvement in lower body strength and endurance. Implementing lunges with progressive overload, Bulgarian split squats, and plyometric exercises like box jumps can increase his power and efficiency in this exercise.
Burpees Broad Jump: The slower time suggests a need for improvement in explosive power and coordination. Plyometric training, including broad jumps, box jumps, and burpees, should be part of his routine. Practicing burpees with an emphasis on minimizing ground contact time will help improve speed and efficiency.
Rowing: To improve his rowing segment, Jonathan should focus on rowing technique drills emphasizing power in the drive phase and efficiency in the recovery phase. Interval training on the rowing machine, such as 500m repeats with 1-2 minutes rest, can improve his anaerobic threshold and overall performance in this segment.
Farmers Carry: This segment could benefit from grip strength and core stability work. Exercises like dead hangs, farmer's walks with increasing distances, and core exercises like planks and dead bugs will enhance his performance in carrying heavy loads over distances.
Race Strategies:
Pacing: Jonathan should aim for a more conservative start to conserve energy for the latter stages of the race. This can be achieved by setting a target pace slightly above the average pace of his previous performances and focusing on maintaining this pace throughout the early running segments.
Transitions (Roxzone): Although Jonathan's transition times were faster than average, there's always room for improvement. Practicing swift and efficient transitions between exercises in training can shave off crucial seconds. This involves setting up mock transition zones in training environments to minimize time spent.
Strength and Endurance Balance: Given Jonathan's stronger performance in strength-based segments, he should not neglect this strength but rather aim to bring his running performance up to a similar level. This involves a balanced training approach that doesn't overly favor one aspect over the other but rather develops both concurrently.
Mental Toughness: The latter stages of the race where Jonathan showed signs of slowing down could also be improved with mental toughness training. Techniques such as visualization, setting small achievable goals throughout the race, and positive self-talk can help in pushing through difficult segments.
By addressing these areas of improvement with focused training and strategic race planning, Jonathan has the potential to significantly enhance his performance in future HYROX events.
Race History
Explore your race history splits in detail below.
The interactive chart provides an easy way to analyze your performance by highlighting faster and slower times across each split.
This tool is designed to help you identify trends, track improvements, and refine your strategy for future races.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men