Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Short Dan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Short Dan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Short Dan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Short Dan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:36. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:29 | 05:33 to 04:04 | 32.2% |
| Wall Balls | 01:17 | 06:20 to 05:03 | 27.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:50 | 04:56 to 04:06 | 18.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:36 | 02:53 to 02:17 | 13.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:09 | 04:05 to 03:56 | 3.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:07 | 01:53 to 01:46 | 2.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:06 | 04:17 to 04:11 | 2.2% |
| Rowing | 00:02 | 04:32 to 04:30 | 0.7% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 36:38 to 36:38 | 0.0% |
| Short Dan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:00 | 00:00 | 04:16 +00:44 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:17 | 05:00 | 04:19 -00:02 | 04:16 +00:44 |
| Running 2 | 04:23 | 09:17 | 04:33 -00:10 | 08:35 +00:42 |
| Sled Push | 02:53 | 13:40 | 02:37 +00:16 | 13:08 +00:32 |
| Running 3 | 04:25 | 16:33 | 04:55 -00:30 | 15:45 +00:48 |
| Sled Pull | 04:05 | 20:58 | 04:22 -00:17 | 20:40 +00:18 |
| Running 4 | 04:26 | 25:03 | 04:53 -00:27 | 25:02 +00:01 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:33 | 29:29 | 04:34 +00:59 | 29:55 -00:26 |
| Running 5 | 04:31 | 35:02 | 05:01 -00:30 | 34:29 +00:33 |
| Rowing | 04:32 | 39:33 | 04:37 -00:05 | 39:30 +00:03 |
| Running 6 | 04:31 | 44:05 | 04:56 -00:25 | 44:07 -00:02 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:53 | 48:36 | 01:59 -00:06 | 49:03 -00:27 |
| Running 7 | 04:40 | 50:29 | 04:54 -00:14 | 51:02 -00:33 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:56 | 55:09 | 04:29 +00:27 | 55:56 -00:47 |
| Running 8 | 04:45 | 01:00:05 | 05:20 -00:35 | 01:00:25 -00:20 |
| Wall Balls | 06:20 | 01:04:50 | 05:41 +00:39 | 01:05:45 -00:55 |
| Roxzone | 06:09 | 01:17:11 | 05:45 +00:24 | 01:17:11 |
Dan Short displayed an impressive performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race, ranking in the top 16% of all athletes. His total running time was 02:24 faster than average, suggesting a strong running profile. However, his Roxzone time, slower than average, indicates a need to improve overall fitness and transition time. While he started slower than average during the first Running segment, he made up for it in subsequent segments, often finishing faster than average. This indicates a good pacing strategy.
Going forward, Dan should prioritize maintaining a steady pace throughout the race. Starting too slow can impact his overall time, so focusing on a quick yet sustainable pace from the beginning can improve his performance. Given his strong running profile, he should also work on improving his transition times to maintain momentum and reduce fatigue during the race. Additionally, focusing on improving his performance in strength-based segments can help him become a more well-rounded athlete, ultimately improving his overall rank.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rathgeber Sören | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:17:28 | |
| Delberghe Aurelien | 2024 Paris | 01:16:44 | |
| Davey Tim | 2024 London | 01:17:19 | |
| Anderson Brian | 2024 Glasgow | 01:16:57 | |
| Mims Tay | 2024 Washington - North American Championships | 01:16:56 | |
| Eberhardt Hannes | 2019 Leipzig | 01:16:52 | |
| Graham Andy | 2024 Melbourne | 01:16:57 | |
| Pasquali Simone | 2023 Milan | 01:17:17 | |
| von Grafenstein Ralf | 2022 Bremen | 01:17:19 | |
| Aboa Christian | 2024 Turin | 01:17:36 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Manchester | 01:20:44 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
