Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Hamburg using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Schröder Kay's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Schröder Kay's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Schröder Kay's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Schröder Kay's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:15. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:43 | 06:20 to 05:37 | 31.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:34 | 05:53 to 05:19 | 25.2% |
| Run Total | 00:21 | 44:38 to 44:17 | 15.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:16 | 02:29 to 02:13 | 11.9% |
| Wall Balls | 00:11 | 06:56 to 06:45 | 8.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:10 | 04:40 to 04:30 | 7.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:40 to 02:40 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:47 to 04:47 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:48 to 04:48 | 0.0% |
| Schröder Kay | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:16 | 00:00 | 04:47 +00:29 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:40 | 05:16 | 04:32 +00:08 | 04:47 +00:29 |
| Running 2 | 05:14 | 09:56 | 05:14 +00:00 | 09:19 +00:37 |
| Sled Push | 02:40 | 15:10 | 03:06 -00:26 | 14:33 +00:37 |
| Running 3 | 05:29 | 17:50 | 05:43 -00:14 | 17:39 +00:11 |
| Sled Pull | 04:47 | 23:19 | 05:19 -00:32 | 23:22 -00:03 |
| Running 4 | 05:34 | 28:06 | 05:41 -00:07 | 28:41 -00:35 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:20 | 33:40 | 05:53 +00:27 | 34:22 -00:42 |
| Running 5 | 05:38 | 40:00 | 05:53 -00:15 | 40:15 -00:15 |
| Rowing | 04:48 | 45:38 | 04:57 -00:09 | 46:08 -00:30 |
| Running 6 | 05:32 | 50:26 | 05:43 -00:11 | 51:05 -00:39 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:29 | 55:58 | 02:19 +00:10 | 56:48 -00:50 |
| Running 7 | 05:34 | 58:27 | 05:42 -00:08 | 59:07 -00:40 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:53 | 01:04:01 | 05:32 +00:21 | 01:04:49 -00:48 |
| Running 8 | 06:24 | 01:09:54 | 06:27 -00:03 | 01:10:21 -00:27 |
| Wall Balls | 06:56 | 01:16:18 | 07:09 -00:13 | 01:16:48 -00:30 |
| Roxzone | 08:24 | 01:31:32 | 07:35 +00:49 | 01:31:32 |
Kay Schröder, a 50-54 year old male athlete from Germany, has shown commendable performance in the 2024 HYROX Hamburg event. With an overall rank of 816 out of 1247 athletes, Kay is in the top 65% of all competitors. He particularly stands out in his age group, ranking 27 out of 65 athletes, putting him in the top 41%.
His total running time of 00:44:38 is 00:48 faster than the average, indicating a strong running profile. His pacing in the first four running segments seems to be slightly slower than average, but he quickly picks up the pace from Running 3 onwards. He demonstrates steady improvement and consistency in his running times, with a best lap time of 00:05:14.
Strength exercises are another area where Kay excels. He consistently performed faster than average in most of the strength segments, such as the Sled Push and Pull, Rowing, and Wall Balls. This indicates a well-rounded athlete who can maintain a balance between strength and endurance.
However, Kay loses some time in the Roxzone segment, which could be due to longer transition times or additional rest periods. This is an area that could be improved with focused training.
Moving forward, it would be beneficial for Kay to focus on pacing himself more effectively during the initial running stages of the race. Starting off at a slightly slower pace can help conserve energy for the more challenging segments ahead. As his strength seems to be running, he should leverage this by pushing harder in the latter running segments where he has consistently shown faster than average times.
Furthermore, Kay should work on improving his transition times between exercises. This could involve practicing transitions during training to minimize downtime and build efficiency. Lastly, incorporating recovery techniques like dynamic stretching and foam rolling post-training can help improve muscle recovery and overall endurance, which can consequently lead to an improvement in his overall time.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gohla Jeanpierre | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:31:46 | |
| Stenstrom Daniel | 2024 Manchester | 01:31:38 | |
| Perkinson James | 2023 Sydney | 01:31:06 | |
| Albrecht Jürgen | 2020 Hannover | 01:31:18 | |
| Pulido Prieto Roberto | 2023 Madrid | 01:31:55 | |
| Van Sandick Joost | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:32:02 | |
| Kraffczyk Alexis | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:32:01 | |
| Fakiera Sonny | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:31:36 | |
| Leckner Jack | 2023 Dallas | 01:31:21 | |
| Lawrence Carwyn | 2024 Manchester | 01:31:22 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
