Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Dallas using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Manila Anthony's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Manila Anthony's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Manila Anthony's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Manila Anthony's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:45. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Push | 02:13 | 04:31 to 02:18 | 38.6% |
| Sled Pull | 01:05 | 05:03 to 03:58 | 18.8% |
| Wall Balls | 00:54 | 06:00 to 05:06 | 15.7% |
| Run Total | 00:52 | 38:34 to 37:42 | 15.1% |
| Rowing | 00:25 | 04:55 to 04:30 | 7.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:11 | 04:19 to 04:08 | 3.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:05 | 01:52 to 01:47 | 1.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:11 to 04:11 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:44 to 03:44 | 0.0% |
| Manila Anthony | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:46 | 00:00 | 04:16 +00:30 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:11 | 04:46 | 04:19 -00:08 | 04:16 +00:30 |
| Running 2 | 04:35 | 08:57 | 04:34 +00:01 | 08:35 +00:22 |
| Sled Push | 04:31 | 13:32 | 02:37 +01:54 | 13:09 +00:23 |
| Running 3 | 04:40 | 18:03 | 04:56 -00:16 | 15:46 +02:17 |
| Sled Pull | 05:03 | 22:43 | 04:21 +00:42 | 20:42 +02:01 |
| Running 4 | 04:49 | 27:46 | 04:54 -00:05 | 25:03 +02:43 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:44 | 32:35 | 04:34 -00:50 | 29:57 +02:38 |
| Running 5 | 05:05 | 36:19 | 05:02 +00:03 | 34:31 +01:48 |
| Rowing | 04:55 | 41:24 | 04:37 +00:18 | 39:33 +01:51 |
| Running 6 | 04:36 | 46:19 | 04:56 -00:20 | 44:10 +02:09 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:52 | 50:55 | 01:59 -00:07 | 49:06 +01:49 |
| Running 7 | 04:49 | 52:47 | 04:54 -00:05 | 51:05 +01:42 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:19 | 57:36 | 04:29 -00:10 | 55:59 +01:37 |
| Running 8 | 05:17 | 01:01:55 | 05:21 -00:04 | 01:00:28 +01:27 |
| Wall Balls | 06:00 | 01:07:12 | 05:40 +00:20 | 01:05:49 +01:23 |
| Roxzone | 04:13 | 01:17:16 | 05:47 -01:34 | 01:17:16 |
However, there are areas of improvement that can be addressed to further enhance his performance. The total running time of 00:38:34 is 00:59 slower than the average, indicating that Anthony could benefit from improving his running speed and endurance. Additionally, the following segments had notable time losses compared to the average: Running 1, Sled Push, Sled Pull, Rowing, and Wall Balls. These segments should be the focus of his training to improve his overall race performance.
In conclusion, while Anthony Manila demonstrated strong performance in the 2022 Dallas Hyrox race, there are areas that can be improved upon to enhance his overall race performance. By focusing on specific training strategies and techniques, such as interval training, strength training, and form corrections, Anthony can continue to elevate his performance and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Waldman Joe | 2024 Manchester | 01:16:51 | |
| Kang Changmook | 2024 Incheon | 01:16:57 | |
| Tripp Christian | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:17:01 | |
| Lee Alan | 2023 Chicago | 01:17:07 | |
| Kooiman Sander | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:17:39 | |
| Joyce Samuel | 2023 London | 01:17:25 | |
| Hill Elliot | 2024 London | 01:17:16 | |
| Marr Casey | 2024 Melbourne | 01:16:57 | |
| Turpin Marrhieu | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:17:44 | |
| Profera Piero | 2024 Rimini | 01:17:11 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2021 Dallas | 01:27:14 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
