Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2019 Oberhausen using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Lange Andreas's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Lange Andreas's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Lange Andreas's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Lange Andreas's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:36. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:28 | 06:23 to 04:55 | 31.9% |
| Wall Balls | 01:01 | 06:59 to 05:58 | 22.1% |
| Run Total | 00:50 | 42:09 to 41:19 | 18.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:38 | 05:24 to 04:46 | 13.8% |
| Rowing | 00:17 | 05:00 to 04:43 | 6.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:16 | 04:38 to 04:22 | 5.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:06 | 04:41 to 04:35 | 2.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:16 to 02:16 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:52 to 01:52 | 0.0% |
| Lange Andreas | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:53 | 00:00 | 04:35 +00:18 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:38 | 04:53 | 04:26 +00:12 | 04:35 +00:18 |
| Running 2 | 05:05 | 09:31 | 04:55 +00:10 | 09:01 +00:30 |
| Sled Push | 02:16 | 14:36 | 02:51 -00:35 | 13:56 +00:40 |
| Running 3 | 05:31 | 16:52 | 05:22 +00:09 | 16:47 +00:05 |
| Sled Pull | 04:41 | 22:23 | 04:52 -00:11 | 22:09 +00:14 |
| Running 4 | 05:25 | 27:04 | 05:20 +00:05 | 27:01 +00:03 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:23 | 32:29 | 05:16 +01:07 | 32:21 +00:08 |
| Running 5 | 05:29 | 38:52 | 05:30 -00:01 | 37:37 +01:15 |
| Rowing | 05:00 | 44:21 | 04:48 +00:12 | 43:07 +01:14 |
| Running 6 | 05:24 | 49:21 | 05:21 +00:03 | 47:55 +01:26 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:52 | 54:45 | 02:09 -00:17 | 53:16 +01:29 |
| Running 7 | 05:09 | 56:37 | 05:20 -00:11 | 55:25 +01:12 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:24 | 01:01:46 | 05:02 +00:22 | 01:00:45 +01:01 |
| Running 8 | 05:16 | 01:07:10 | 05:57 -00:41 | 01:05:47 +01:23 |
| Wall Balls | 06:59 | 01:12:26 | 06:26 +00:33 | 01:11:44 +00:42 |
| Roxzone | 05:36 | 01:24:53 | 06:43 -01:07 | 01:24:53 |
In terms of pacing, Andreas showed consistency throughout the race, with most of his splits being within a few seconds of the average for his finish time. However, his best running lap was 00:26 slower than average, suggesting that he may have started the race too fast or struggled to maintain his pace towards the end. To improve his overall performance, Andreas should work on his pacing strategy and focus on maintaining a steady pace throughout the race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mc Gailey Jack | 2024 Glasgow | 01:24:50 | |
| Borsboom Jos | 2024 Maastricht | 01:24:52 | |
| Escribano Martinez Eduardo | 2023 Malaga | 01:25:05 | |
| Sample Craig | 2023 London | 01:25:10 | |
| King Rob | 2023 Glasgow | 01:25:18 | |
| Blanvillain Rémi | 2023 Paris | 01:24:38 | |
| Rossin Alessandro | 2024 Milan | 01:24:28 | |
| Cobb John | 2023 Birmingham | 01:25:12 | |
| Asensio Pavo Aritz | 2023 Bilbao | 01:25:06 | |
| Caceres Quezada Jorge Arturo | 2023 Bilbao | 01:25:05 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2018 Hamburg | 01:09:58 | |
| World Championships | 01:33:18 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
