Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Venema Rogier's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Venema Rogier's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Venema Rogier's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Venema Rogier's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:51. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:08 | 45:48 to 42:40 | 64.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:56 | 03:45 to 02:49 | 19.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:30 | 02:37 to 02:07 | 10.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:17 | 05:31 to 05:14 | 5.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:17 to 04:17 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:20 to 04:20 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:37 to 04:37 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:59 to 04:59 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:40 to 05:40 | 0.0% |
| Venema Rogier | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:56 | 00:00 | 04:41 -00:45 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:17 | 03:56 | 04:29 -00:12 | 04:41 -00:45 |
| Running 2 | 05:57 | 08:13 | 05:04 +00:53 | 09:10 -00:57 |
| Sled Push | 03:45 | 14:10 | 02:59 +00:46 | 14:14 -00:04 |
| Running 3 | 05:47 | 17:55 | 05:31 +00:16 | 17:13 +00:42 |
| Sled Pull | 04:20 | 23:42 | 05:05 -00:45 | 22:44 +00:58 |
| Running 4 | 05:51 | 28:02 | 05:29 +00:22 | 27:49 +00:13 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:31 | 33:53 | 05:33 -00:02 | 33:18 +00:35 |
| Running 5 | 06:03 | 39:24 | 05:41 +00:22 | 38:51 +00:33 |
| Rowing | 04:37 | 45:27 | 04:52 -00:15 | 44:32 +00:55 |
| Running 6 | 05:59 | 50:04 | 05:32 +00:27 | 49:24 +00:40 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:37 | 56:03 | 02:14 +00:23 | 54:56 +01:07 |
| Running 7 | 06:07 | 58:40 | 05:31 +00:36 | 57:10 +01:30 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:59 | 01:04:47 | 05:17 -00:18 | 01:02:41 +02:06 |
| Running 8 | 06:12 | 01:09:46 | 06:09 +00:03 | 01:07:58 +01:48 |
| Wall Balls | 05:40 | 01:15:58 | 06:46 -01:06 | 01:14:07 +01:51 |
| Roxzone | 06:28 | 01:27:59 | 07:06 -00:38 | 01:27:59 |
Rogier Venema delivered a commendable performance during the 2024 Amsterdam HYROX event, securing an overall rank within the top 38% of competitors. His standout strength was his efficiency in transitioning through the roxzone and high proficiency in strength-based exercises such as the sled pull and wall balls. However, his total running time indicates that running is a key area where improvements can be made, suggesting that he leans more towards a strength-based rather than a running profile. Additionally, his initial pacing was slightly too aggressive, as evidenced by his faster-than-average time in the first running segment, followed by slower performances in subsequent running segments.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Pinkham Thomas | 2024 Birmingham | 01:27:33 | |
| Burgess Oliver | 2024 London | 01:28:19 | |
| Weed Malcolm | 2024 Incheon | 01:27:48 | |
| Turnbull Jason | 2023 Melbourne | 01:27:38 | |
| La Porte Miguel | 2024 Dallas | 01:27:30 | |
| Arzadon Alvin | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:28:07 | |
| Marks Jason Murray | 2024 Anaheim | 01:27:53 | |
| Velazquez Carlos | 2021 Madrid | 01:27:33 | |
| Green Christopher | 2024 Melbourne | 01:28:29 | |
| Huth Simon | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:28:23 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:30:37 | |
| 2023 Amsterdam | 01:41:15 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
