Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Stuttgart using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire GriffithElliott Onika's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights GriffithElliott Onika's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the GriffithElliott Onika's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve GriffithElliott Onika's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:48. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:34 | 06:01 to 04:27 | 32.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:00 | 06:45 to 05:45 | 20.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:51 | 05:24 to 04:33 | 17.7% |
| Rowing | 00:23 | 05:39 to 05:16 | 8.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:20 | 05:41 to 05:21 | 6.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:19 | 02:52 to 02:33 | 6.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:12 | 05:13 to 05:01 | 4.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:09 | 02:16 to 02:07 | 3.1% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 41:47 to 41:47 | 0.0% |
| GriffithElliott Onika | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:02 | 00:00 | 05:09 -00:07 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:13 | 05:02 | 05:07 +00:06 | 05:09 -00:07 |
| Running 2 | 04:50 | 10:15 | 05:27 -00:37 | 10:16 -00:01 |
| Sled Push | 02:52 | 15:05 | 02:45 +00:07 | 15:43 -00:38 |
| Running 3 | 05:12 | 17:57 | 05:45 -00:33 | 18:28 -00:31 |
| Sled Pull | 05:41 | 23:09 | 05:44 -00:03 | 24:13 -01:04 |
| Running 4 | 05:13 | 28:50 | 05:47 -00:34 | 29:57 -01:07 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:45 | 34:03 | 06:01 +00:44 | 35:44 -01:41 |
| Running 5 | 05:09 | 40:48 | 05:55 -00:46 | 41:45 -00:57 |
| Rowing | 05:39 | 45:57 | 05:22 +00:17 | 47:40 -01:43 |
| Running 6 | 05:58 | 51:36 | 05:48 +00:10 | 53:02 -01:26 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:16 | 57:34 | 02:16 +00:00 | 58:50 -01:16 |
| Running 7 | 05:03 | 59:50 | 05:47 -00:44 | 01:01:06 -01:16 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:24 | 01:04:53 | 04:43 +00:41 | 01:06:53 -02:00 |
| Running 8 | 05:23 | 01:10:17 | 06:10 -00:47 | 01:11:36 -01:19 |
| Wall Balls | 06:01 | 01:15:40 | 04:52 +01:09 | 01:17:46 -02:06 |
| Roxzone | 07:55 | 01:29:28 | 06:50 +01:05 | 01:29:28 |
Onika GriffithElliott demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Stuttgart Hyrox race, finishing in the top 14% overall and top 15% in her age group. Her total running time was significantly faster than average by 4 minutes and 36 seconds, indicating a strong runner profile. The performance across the initial running segments suggests she started at an optimal pace, maintaining a consistent and competitive speed. Her best running lap time of 4 minutes and 50 seconds further highlights her running prowess. However, the slower transition times in the Roxzone and specific strength exercises suggest areas for improvement in strength and recovery speed during transitions.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hommes Katrin | 2018 Hamburg | 01:29:31 | |
| Beattie Jennifer | 2023 Birmingham | 01:29:52 | |
| Mukerji Oonagh | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:29:21 | |
| Luna Fabiola | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:29:08 | |
| Benade Anna | 2024 Brisbane | 01:29:51 | |
| Hawkins Liz | 2024 Houston | 01:29:20 | |
| Fröhlich Galina | 2021 Stuttgart | 01:29:53 | |
| Wierda Liesbeth | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:29:52 | |
| Hamada Anissa | 2024 Paris | 01:29:33 | |
| Shevlin Charlie | 2024 Dublin | 01:29:04 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Rimini | 01:38:14 | |
| 2024 Stockholm | 01:32:09 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
