Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 224 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Froggatt Mathew's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Froggatt Mathew's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Froggatt Mathew's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Froggatt Mathew's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:29. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 04:22 | 14:41 to 10:19 | 58.4% |
| Ski Erg | 01:20 | 06:21 to 05:01 | 17.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:59 | 08:45 to 07:46 | 13.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:42 | 09:08 to 08:26 | 9.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:03 | 04:22 to 04:19 | 0.7% |
| Rowing | 00:03 | 05:37 to 05:34 | 0.7% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 07:17 to 07:17 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:49 to 02:49 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 55:27 to 55:27 | 0.0% |
| Froggatt Mathew | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 07:34 | 00:00 | 05:47 +01:47 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 06:21 | 07:34 | 05:01 +01:20 | 05:47 +01:47 |
| Running 2 | 06:29 | 13:55 | 06:56 -00:27 | 10:48 +03:07 |
| Sled Push | 04:22 | 20:24 | 04:09 +00:13 | 17:44 +02:40 |
| Running 3 | 06:26 | 24:46 | 07:36 -01:10 | 21:53 +02:53 |
| Sled Pull | 07:17 | 31:12 | 07:34 -00:17 | 29:29 +01:43 |
| Running 4 | 06:51 | 38:29 | 07:32 -00:41 | 37:03 +01:26 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 09:08 | 45:20 | 08:59 +00:09 | 44:35 +00:45 |
| Running 5 | 06:28 | 54:28 | 08:04 -01:36 | 53:34 +00:54 |
| Rowing | 05:37 | 01:00:56 | 05:41 -00:04 | 01:01:38 -00:42 |
| Running 6 | 06:51 | 01:06:33 | 07:44 -00:53 | 01:07:19 -00:46 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:49 | 01:13:24 | 03:04 -00:15 | 01:15:03 -01:39 |
| Running 7 | 06:49 | 01:16:13 | 07:50 -01:01 | 01:18:07 -01:54 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 08:45 | 01:23:02 | 08:38 +00:07 | 01:25:57 -02:55 |
| Running 8 | 08:02 | 01:31:47 | 10:14 -02:12 | 01:34:35 -02:48 |
| Wall Balls | 14:41 | 01:39:49 | 11:18 +03:23 | 01:44:49 -05:00 |
| Roxzone | 13:19 | 02:07:41 | 11:34 +01:45 | 02:07:41 |
Mathew Froggatt, a HYROX competitor in the 40-44 age group, has placed in the top 65% of 4107 athletes in the Birmingham 2024 event. His overall rank of 2672 and age group rank of 482 indicate a solid performance, and his total running time of 00:55:27 was notably faster than the average. This suggests Mathew has a runner profile, excelling in running segments. However, his slower Roxzone time indicates room for improvement in his transition and overall fitness.
Mathew's pacing appears to be well-managed, with his running speed generally increasing as the race progressed. This suggests effective endurance and energy management. However, there is room for improvement in strength-related tasks, particularly Wall Balls, Ski Erg, and Sandbag Lunges.
Mathew would benefit from implementing the following strategies in his future races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Pander Hylke | 2024 Rotterdam | 02:07:37 | |
| Toben Ron | 2023 Hamburg | 02:07:34 | |
| Nintscheff Lukas | 2019 Hamburg | 02:07:49 | |
| Carolina JuliusCarl | 2024 Rotterdam | 02:07:49 | |
| Rodriguez Jonay | 2024 Glasgow | 02:07:17 | |
| Hudson Justin | 2023 Manchester | 02:07:39 | |
| Silulu Chas | 2024 Melbourne | 02:08:03 | |
| Clasen Sebastian | 2019 Oberhausen | 02:07:43 | |
| Castro Gilberto | 2021 Dallas | 02:07:25 | |
| Krstic Scott | 2024 Melbourne | 02:07:54 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
