Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire De Vries Frank's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights De Vries Frank's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the De Vries Frank's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve De Vries Frank's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:10. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 02:22 | 08:22 to 06:00 | 45.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:02 | 08:29 to 06:27 | 39.4% |
| Run Total | 00:41 | 48:25 to 47:44 | 13.2% |
| Rowing | 00:05 | 05:10 to 05:05 | 1.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:33 to 04:33 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:28 to 02:28 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:07 to 05:07 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:07 to 02:07 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 07:45 to 07:45 | 0.0% |
| De Vries Frank | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:20 | 00:00 | 05:05 -00:45 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:33 | 04:20 | 04:39 -00:06 | 05:05 -00:45 |
| Running 2 | 06:00 | 08:53 | 05:35 +00:25 | 09:44 -00:51 |
| Sled Push | 02:28 | 14:53 | 03:26 -00:58 | 15:19 -00:26 |
| Running 3 | 06:05 | 17:21 | 06:07 -00:02 | 18:45 -01:24 |
| Sled Pull | 05:07 | 23:26 | 05:52 -00:45 | 24:52 -01:26 |
| Running 4 | 06:14 | 28:33 | 06:05 +00:09 | 30:44 -02:11 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:29 | 34:47 | 06:36 +01:53 | 36:49 -02:02 |
| Running 5 | 06:18 | 43:16 | 06:21 -00:03 | 43:25 -00:09 |
| Rowing | 05:10 | 49:34 | 05:08 +00:02 | 49:46 -00:12 |
| Running 6 | 06:18 | 54:44 | 06:09 +00:09 | 54:54 -00:10 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:07 | 01:01:02 | 02:32 -00:25 | 01:01:03 -00:01 |
| Running 7 | 06:11 | 01:03:09 | 06:09 +00:02 | 01:03:35 -00:26 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 08:22 | 01:09:20 | 06:13 +02:09 | 01:09:44 -00:24 |
| Running 8 | 07:02 | 01:17:42 | 07:09 -00:07 | 01:15:57 +01:45 |
| Wall Balls | 07:45 | 01:24:44 | 08:03 -00:18 | 01:23:06 +01:38 |
| Roxzone | 07:22 | 01:39:44 | 08:35 -01:13 | 01:39:44 |
Frank De Vries delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, finishing in the top 57% overall and in the top 42% of his age group. His total running time was notably faster than average, indicating a strong running profile. However, some segments, notably those requiring significant strength and endurance like the Sandbag Lunges and Burpees Broad Jump, presented challenges. His initial running segments were quite fast, suggesting a slightly aggressive start which may have impacted his endurance in later stages.
This segment was significantly slower than average. To improve:
Performance here was also below average. To address this:
Consider the impact of compromised running after strength-intensive exercises:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Newman Rob | 2024 London | 01:40:09 | |
| Bugueno Milenko | 2023 München | 01:40:08 | |
| Navarrete Eduardo | 2024 Turin | 01:40:06 | |
| Cleary Conor | 2023 Dublin | 01:40:14 | |
| Meffert Christian | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:39:30 | |
| Cheng Yap Toh | 2024 Singapore | 01:39:18 | |
| Adlerz Göran | 2023 Stockholm | 01:39:51 | |
| Gorgeri Lorenzo | 2024 Milan | 01:39:32 | |
| Hotopp Matt | 2022 Chicago | 01:39:23 | |
| meier florian | 2021 Stuttgart | 01:40:03 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
