Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 230 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Coleman Louise's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Coleman Louise's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Coleman Louise's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Coleman Louise's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:22. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:17 | 01:02:36 to 57:19 | 98.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:05 | 07:55 to 07:50 | 1.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:20 to 05:20 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:34 to 03:34 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 08:34 to 08:34 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:27 to 05:27 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:32 to 02:32 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 06:42 to 06:42 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:52 to 05:52 | 0.0% |
| Coleman Louise | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:39 | 00:00 | 06:12 +00:27 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:20 | 06:39 | 05:35 -00:15 | 06:12 +00:27 |
| Running 2 | 08:45 | 11:59 | 06:53 +01:52 | 11:47 +00:12 |
| Sled Push | 03:34 | 20:44 | 03:37 -00:03 | 18:40 +02:04 |
| Running 3 | 03:45 | 24:18 | 07:25 -03:40 | 22:17 +02:01 |
| Sled Pull | 07:55 | 28:03 | 07:39 +00:16 | 29:42 -01:39 |
| Running 4 | 07:48 | 35:58 | 07:26 +00:22 | 37:21 -01:23 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:34 | 43:46 | 09:51 -01:17 | 44:47 -01:01 |
| Running 5 | 10:09 | 52:20 | 08:07 +02:02 | 54:38 -02:18 |
| Rowing | 05:27 | 01:02:29 | 06:04 -00:37 | 01:02:45 -00:16 |
| Running 6 | 08:24 | 01:07:56 | 07:40 +00:44 | 01:08:49 -00:53 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:32 | 01:16:20 | 02:51 -00:19 | 01:16:29 -00:09 |
| Running 7 | 07:03 | 01:18:52 | 07:42 -00:39 | 01:19:20 -00:28 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:42 | 01:25:55 | 07:16 -00:34 | 01:27:02 -01:07 |
| Running 8 | 10:06 | 01:32:37 | 09:03 +01:03 | 01:34:18 -01:41 |
| Wall Balls | 05:52 | 01:42:43 | 07:34 -01:42 | 01:43:21 -00:38 |
| Roxzone | 12:32 | 02:01:00 | 10:05 +02:27 | 02:01:00 |
Louise Coleman displayed a commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race, ranking in the top 31% overall and the top 30% in her age group. Louise demonstrated strength in several exercise areas, particularly the Ski Erg and Rowing segments, where she was faster than the average. Her running profile, however, appears to need improvement as the 'Total running time' was slower than average by 1:08. The pacing in the first four running segments suggest that Louise started slower than average, although she managed to pick up the pace in the latter half of the race.
During the race, Louise should focus on maintaining a consistent pace throughout the running segments, rather than starting slower and having to make up for lost time. Practicing pace management during training runs can help with this. She should also aim to minimize rest and transition times, particularly in the Roxzone. Finally, she should ensure she is adequately warmed up before the race to prevent injury and optimize performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Nitsch Hanna | 2022 Leipzig | 02:00:44 | |
| Watts Cas | 2024 Dallas | 02:00:45 | |
| Palmer Kylie | 2024 Sydney | 02:00:33 | |
| Tortajada Simarro Esther | 2022 Valencia | 02:01:04 | |
| Eliasson Eva | 2024 Copenhagen | 02:00:43 | |
| Murtagh Nichola | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 02:00:58 | |
| Tee Renee | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 02:01:26 | |
| Bradford Rebekah | 2024 Birmingham | 02:00:45 | |
| Paton Gemma | 2024 Madrid | 02:01:25 | |
| O Sullivan Eimear | 2024 Dublin | 02:00:59 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
