Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Paris using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Billet Ophélie's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Billet Ophélie's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Billet Ophélie's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Billet Ophélie's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:48. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:20 | 47:11 to 45:51 | 47.6% |
| Wall Balls | 00:36 | 05:15 to 04:39 | 21.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:19 | 06:17 to 05:58 | 11.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:14 | 02:24 to 02:10 | 8.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:10 | 05:41 to 05:31 | 6.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:09 | 02:47 to 02:38 | 5.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:04 to 05:04 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:47 to 04:47 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:16 to 04:16 | 0.0% |
| Billet Ophélie | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:55 | 00:00 | 05:11 -00:16 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:04 | 04:55 | 05:09 -00:05 | 05:11 -00:16 |
| Running 2 | 05:44 | 09:59 | 05:33 +00:11 | 10:20 -00:21 |
| Sled Push | 02:47 | 15:43 | 02:48 -00:01 | 15:53 -00:10 |
| Running 3 | 06:03 | 18:30 | 05:52 +00:11 | 18:41 -00:11 |
| Sled Pull | 05:41 | 24:33 | 05:54 -00:13 | 24:33 +00:00 |
| Running 4 | 06:00 | 30:14 | 05:53 +00:07 | 30:27 -00:13 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:17 | 36:14 | 06:16 +00:01 | 36:20 -00:06 |
| Running 5 | 06:13 | 42:31 | 06:02 +00:11 | 42:36 -00:05 |
| Rowing | 04:47 | 48:44 | 05:25 -00:38 | 48:38 +00:06 |
| Running 6 | 05:46 | 53:31 | 05:56 -00:10 | 54:03 -00:32 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:24 | 59:17 | 02:19 +00:05 | 59:59 -00:42 |
| Running 7 | 05:58 | 01:01:41 | 05:54 +00:04 | 01:02:18 -00:37 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:16 | 01:07:39 | 04:53 -00:37 | 01:08:12 -00:33 |
| Running 8 | 06:36 | 01:11:55 | 06:20 +00:16 | 01:13:05 -01:10 |
| Wall Balls | 05:15 | 01:18:31 | 05:04 +00:11 | 01:19:25 -00:54 |
| Roxzone | 07:56 | 01:31:34 | 07:05 +00:51 | 01:31:34 |
Ophélie Billet has demonstrated a commendable performance in the HYROX race, finishing in the top 12% of all athletes, and the top 13% of her age group. Her total running time was slightly slower than average, suggesting that she may be more strength-focused in her training. Ophélie started the race with a fast pace, completing the first running segment faster than the average, but gradually lost time in the subsequent running segments, indicating that her pacing strategy might need some adjustment.
Run Total: Ophélie's overall running performance was slower than average. To improve her running speed, she could incorporate interval training in her workout. Interval training involves alternating between high-intensity and low-intensity running, which can help increase speed and stamina. Roxzone: Ophélie's time in the Roxzone was slower than average, indicating that she may have taken longer rest periods or had slower transition times. Ophélie could work on improving her overall fitness with exercises that target endurance, such as long-distance running or cycling. Additionally, practicing transitions between exercises could also help reduce time spent in the Roxzone. Wall Balls: This segment was slower than average, suggesting a need to improve strength and coordination. Ophélie could incorporate more functional training exercises like squats, lunges or power cleans to increase her strength. She could also practice the specific movement of the wall ball exercise to improve her coordination and speed. Burpees Broad Jump: Ophélie was slower in this segment, indicating a need for more explosive power and endurance. Incorporating plyometric exercises such as box jumps or jump squats could help improve her performance in this area.
Pacing Strategy: Ophélie started the race faster than average but lost speed in the subsequent running segments. She could benefit from a more consistent pacing strategy. This might involve starting at an average pace and gradually increasing speed as the race progresses. Rest and Transition: Ophélie could work on reducing her rest periods and improving her transition times. This could involve practicing transitions between exercises and focusing on maintaining a steady heart rate throughout the race. Strength and Endurance Training: As Ophélie's performance suggests a strength-focused training approach, she could benefit from more balanced training that includes both strength and endurance exercises. This could include long-distance running or cycling for endurance, and weightlifting or functional training exercises for strength.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lloyd Claire | 2024 Glasgow | 01:31:56 | |
| Weingardt Yvonne | 2019 Hamburg | 01:31:11 | |
| Cartwright Jodie | 2023 Manchester | 01:31:31 | |
| Obenaus Sabine | 2023 Hannover | 01:31:34 | |
| Therkildsen Therese | 2023 Malmö | 01:31:28 | |
| Veuger Roos | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:31:37 | |
| Kelly Ciara | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:31:48 | |
| Clark Rhea | 2024 London | 01:31:16 | |
| Hanse Noemie | 2024 Paris | 01:31:54 | |
| Halsey Andrea | 2023 London | 01:31:57 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
