Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Dubai using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Hague Tobias's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hague Tobias's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hague Tobias's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hague Tobias's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:02. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:44 | 41:26 to 38:42 | 67.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:22 | 02:13 to 01:51 | 9.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:18 | 04:26 to 04:08 | 7.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:16 | 04:34 to 04:18 | 6.6% |
| Rowing | 00:12 | 04:46 to 04:34 | 5.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:10 | 05:29 to 05:19 | 4.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:12 to 04:12 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:18 to 02:18 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:14 to 04:14 | 0.0% |
| Hague Tobias | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:53 | 00:00 | 04:20 -00:27 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:12 | 03:53 | 04:20 -00:08 | 04:20 -00:27 |
| Running 2 | 04:54 | 08:05 | 04:40 +00:14 | 08:40 -00:35 |
| Sled Push | 02:18 | 12:59 | 02:41 -00:23 | 13:20 -00:21 |
| Running 3 | 05:29 | 15:17 | 05:03 +00:26 | 16:01 -00:44 |
| Sled Pull | 04:26 | 20:46 | 04:28 -00:02 | 21:04 -00:18 |
| Running 4 | 05:12 | 25:12 | 05:02 +00:10 | 25:32 -00:20 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:14 | 30:24 | 04:45 -00:31 | 30:34 -00:10 |
| Running 5 | 05:28 | 34:38 | 05:11 +00:17 | 35:19 -00:41 |
| Rowing | 04:46 | 40:06 | 04:40 +00:06 | 40:30 -00:24 |
| Running 6 | 05:22 | 44:52 | 05:04 +00:18 | 45:10 -00:18 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:13 | 50:14 | 02:02 +00:11 | 50:14 +00:00 |
| Running 7 | 05:24 | 52:27 | 05:02 +00:22 | 52:16 +00:11 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:34 | 57:51 | 04:37 -00:03 | 57:18 +00:33 |
| Running 8 | 05:47 | 01:02:25 | 05:31 +00:16 | 01:01:55 +00:30 |
| Wall Balls | 05:29 | 01:08:12 | 05:49 -00:20 | 01:07:26 +00:46 |
| Roxzone | 05:44 | 01:19:17 | 06:02 -00:18 | 01:19:17 |
In terms of his splits analysis, Tobias showed great strength in the Ski Erg and Sled Push segments, where he was faster than the average time by 5 seconds and 41 seconds, respectively. His best running lap time of 00:03:53 was an impressive 19 seconds faster than the average time.
However, Tobias struggled in several running segments, particularly Running 2, Running 3, Running 5, Running 6, and Running 7, where he was slower than the average time by 16 seconds, 25 seconds, 18 seconds, 20 seconds, and 22 seconds, respectively. Additionally, his total running time of 00:41:26 was 2 minutes and 45 seconds slower than the average time.
In conclusion, Tobias Hague demonstrated impressive performance in the 2023 Dubai Hyrox race. By focusing on improving his running performance, reducing transition time, and implementing effective race strategies, he can further enhance his overall performance and achieve even better results in future events.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Laumeier David | 2024 Berlin | 01:19:11 | |
| Craik Arland | 2022 Birmingham | 01:19:19 | |
| Deutsch Thomas | 2023 Hamburg | 01:19:30 | |
| Recinos Luis | 2022 Hamburg | 01:19:32 | |
| Mohamed Ahmed | 2023 Dubai | 01:19:07 | |
| Robinson Michael | 2024 London | 01:18:57 | |
| Zuidema Esquar | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:19:36 | |
| Mitchell Luke | 2023 Manchester | 01:19:47 | |
| White Sean | 2023 Houston | 01:19:34 | |
| Christiansen Jon | 2023 Malmö | 01:19:22 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Dubai | 01:12:16 | |
| 2022 London | 01:24:13 | |
| 2022 London | 01:29:09 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
