Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Maastricht using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Van Hamersveld Daan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Van Hamersveld Daan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Van Hamersveld Daan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van Hamersveld Daan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:24. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:51 | 48:09 to 46:18 | 54.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:05 | 06:48 to 05:43 | 31.9% |
| Wall Balls | 00:15 | 07:35 to 07:20 | 7.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:13 | 02:36 to 02:23 | 6.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:25 to 04:25 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:30 to 02:30 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:41 to 04:41 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:03 to 06:03 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:00 to 05:00 | 0.0% |
| Van Hamersveld Daan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:36 | 00:00 | 05:00 -00:24 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:25 | 04:36 | 04:36 -00:11 | 05:00 -00:24 |
| Running 2 | 05:22 | 09:01 | 05:24 -00:02 | 09:36 -00:35 |
| Sled Push | 02:30 | 14:23 | 03:15 -00:45 | 15:00 -00:37 |
| Running 3 | 06:06 | 16:53 | 05:56 +00:10 | 18:15 -01:22 |
| Sled Pull | 04:41 | 22:59 | 05:37 -00:56 | 24:11 -01:12 |
| Running 4 | 06:07 | 27:40 | 05:55 +00:12 | 29:48 -02:08 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:03 | 33:47 | 06:21 -00:18 | 35:43 -01:56 |
| Running 5 | 06:13 | 39:50 | 06:08 +00:05 | 42:04 -02:14 |
| Rowing | 05:00 | 46:03 | 05:03 -00:03 | 48:12 -02:09 |
| Running 6 | 06:02 | 51:03 | 05:58 +00:04 | 53:15 -02:12 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:36 | 57:05 | 02:26 +00:10 | 59:13 -02:08 |
| Running 7 | 06:08 | 59:41 | 05:56 +00:12 | 01:01:39 -01:58 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:48 | 01:05:49 | 05:54 +00:54 | 01:07:35 -01:46 |
| Running 8 | 07:41 | 01:12:37 | 06:49 +00:52 | 01:13:29 -00:52 |
| Wall Balls | 07:35 | 01:20:18 | 07:42 -00:07 | 01:20:18 +00:00 |
| Roxzone | 08:29 | 01:36:12 | 08:12 +00:17 | 01:36:12 |
It's worth noting that Daan performed well in some segments, such as Running 1 and Ski Erg, where he was faster than the average by 9 and 8 seconds, respectively. However, he struggled in other segments, including Running 3, Running 4, Burpees Broad Jump, Running 5, Running 6, Running 7, Sandbag Lunges, and Running 8, where he was slower than the average by various margins.
In conclusion, Daan Van Hamersveld had a commendable performance in the 2022 Maastricht Hyrox race. To improve his overall performance, he should focus on improving his running speed and endurance, particularly in the slower segments. Incorporating specific training strategies, such as interval training, strength exercises, and efficient transitions, will help him enhance his performance in these areas. By implementing these recommendations and maintaining a consistent and sustainable race pace, Daan can continue to improve and achieve better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Koffner Stefan | 2019 Hamburg | 01:36:36 | |
| OBrien Dan | 2024 Stockholm | 01:35:49 | |
| Robertsson Göran | 2024 Stockholm | 01:36:33 | |
| Saksida Jan | 2024 Rimini | 01:35:58 | |
| Mears Luke | 2022 London | 01:36:27 | |
| Slaven Ben | 2023 Glasgow | 01:36:04 | |
| Hill Jordan | 2022 Manchester | 01:36:42 | |
| Murray Myles | 2023 Dublin | 01:36:10 | |
| Moratalla Perez Jose Ignacio | 2022 Valencia | 01:35:48 | |
| Elping Benny | 2021 Berlin | 01:36:38 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
