Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Milan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 955 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Peña Juan Carlos's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Peña Juan Carlos's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Peña Juan Carlos's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Peña Juan Carlos's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 09:31. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 06:01 | 14:28 to 08:27 | 63.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:39 | 08:08 to 06:29 | 17.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:53 | 04:30 to 03:37 | 9.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:34 | 06:45 to 06:11 | 6.0% |
| Rowing | 00:13 | 05:26 to 05:13 | 2.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:11 | 04:57 to 04:46 | 1.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:58 to 06:58 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:42 to 01:42 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 45:40 to 45:40 | 0.0% |
| Peña Juan Carlos | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:27 | 00:00 | 05:20 +01:07 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:57 | 06:27 | 04:45 +00:12 | 05:20 +01:07 |
| Running 2 | 05:18 | 11:24 | 05:48 -00:30 | 10:05 +01:19 |
| Sled Push | 04:30 | 16:42 | 03:35 +00:55 | 15:53 +00:49 |
| Running 3 | 05:37 | 21:12 | 06:26 -00:49 | 19:28 +01:44 |
| Sled Pull | 06:45 | 26:49 | 06:19 +00:26 | 25:54 +00:55 |
| Running 4 | 05:45 | 33:34 | 06:26 -00:41 | 32:13 +01:21 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:58 | 39:19 | 07:14 -00:16 | 38:39 +00:40 |
| Running 5 | 05:34 | 46:17 | 06:44 -01:10 | 45:53 +00:24 |
| Rowing | 05:26 | 51:51 | 05:16 +00:10 | 52:37 -00:46 |
| Running 6 | 05:51 | 57:17 | 06:29 -00:38 | 57:53 -00:36 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:42 | 01:03:08 | 02:40 -00:58 | 01:04:22 -01:14 |
| Running 7 | 06:15 | 01:04:50 | 06:31 -00:16 | 01:07:02 -02:12 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 08:08 | 01:11:05 | 06:44 +01:24 | 01:13:33 -02:28 |
| Running 8 | 04:56 | 01:19:13 | 07:46 -02:50 | 01:20:17 -01:04 |
| Wall Balls | 14:28 | 01:24:09 | 08:53 +05:35 | 01:28:03 -03:54 |
| Roxzone | 07:49 | 01:46:19 | 09:23 -01:34 | 01:46:19 |
Juan Carlos Peña demonstrated a strong running performance throughout the Hyrox race, evidenced by his total running time of 45:40, which is notably 6:19 faster than the average, indicating a runner profile. His fastest lap was an impressive 4:56, showcasing his capability to maintain speed under fatigue. Despite being in the top 52% of his age group, his overall rank placed him in the top 82% among all athletes, suggesting room for improvement in certain areas. Notably, he started the race slower than average, as seen in Running 1, and gradually gained momentum, indicating a conservative pacing strategy initially.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Samperio Tolentino Alfredo | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:45:55 | |
| Kaimakis Alexander | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:46:37 | |
| Moss Gary | 2024 Manchester | 01:46:48 | |
| Cella Walter | 2023 Milan | 01:46:44 | |
| Kahraman Hüseyin | 2022 München | 01:46:47 | |
| Nayar Anil | 2024 Glasgow | 01:46:49 | |
| Chong Zhe Wei | 2024 Taipei | 01:46:14 | |
| Sánchez Luna Emmanuel Alfonso | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:46:34 | |
| Rounkles Kevin | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:46:29 | |
| Yuan Bruce Haibo | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:46:15 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Madrid | 01:39:48 | |
| 2024 Madrid | 01:36:57 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
