Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 831 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Liew Derrick's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Liew Derrick's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Liew Derrick's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Liew Derrick's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:14. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:52 | 56:40 to 50:48 | 94.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:11 | 06:30 to 06:19 | 2.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:05 | 06:42 to 06:37 | 1.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:03 | 04:51 to 04:48 | 0.8% |
| Rowing | 00:03 | 05:19 to 05:16 | 0.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:18 to 03:18 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:54 to 06:54 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:08 to 02:08 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 07:38 to 07:38 | 0.0% |
| Liew Derrick | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:16 | 00:00 | 05:23 -00:07 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:51 | 05:16 | 04:45 +00:06 | 05:23 -00:07 |
| Running 2 | 05:54 | 10:07 | 05:55 -00:01 | 10:08 -00:01 |
| Sled Push | 03:18 | 16:01 | 03:37 -00:19 | 16:03 -00:02 |
| Running 3 | 06:03 | 19:19 | 06:34 -00:31 | 19:40 -00:21 |
| Sled Pull | 06:30 | 25:22 | 06:21 +00:09 | 26:14 -00:52 |
| Running 4 | 06:05 | 31:52 | 06:33 -00:28 | 32:35 -00:43 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:54 | 37:57 | 07:23 -00:29 | 39:08 -01:11 |
| Running 5 | 06:37 | 44:51 | 06:51 -00:14 | 46:31 -01:40 |
| Rowing | 05:19 | 51:28 | 05:16 +00:03 | 53:22 -01:54 |
| Running 6 | 13:22 | 56:47 | 06:38 +06:44 | 58:38 -01:51 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:08 | 01:10:09 | 02:40 -00:32 | 01:05:16 +04:53 |
| Running 7 | 06:20 | 01:12:17 | 06:36 -00:16 | 01:07:56 +04:21 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:42 | 01:18:37 | 06:54 -00:12 | 01:14:32 +04:05 |
| Running 8 | 07:06 | 01:25:19 | 08:00 -00:54 | 01:21:26 +03:53 |
| Wall Balls | 07:38 | 01:32:25 | 08:55 -01:17 | 01:29:26 +02:59 |
| Roxzone | 08:02 | 01:47:58 | 09:37 -01:35 | 01:47:58 |
Derrick Liew completed the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox event with an overall time of 01:47:58, ranking in the top 55% of all athletes. In his age group (25-29), he placed in the top 49%. While he exhibited strong performance in strength-based exercises like the Sled Push and Farmers Carry, his total running time lagged by 03:53 compared to the average, indicating a need for improved running efficiency. Notably, Derrick's pacing strategy started well but significantly slowed during Running 6, suggesting potential fatigue management issues. Overall, his profile leans towards a hybrid athlete with a slight emphasis on strength, considering his running split times were often faster than average but total running time was slower.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sardella Alessandro | 2024 Rimini | 01:48:16 | |
| Hamilton Chris | 2024 Dublin | 01:48:13 | |
| Freeman Andrew | 2024 Melbourne | 01:47:29 | |
| Robinson Daniel | 2024 Birmingham | 01:48:25 | |
| Mehenni Nahim | 2024 Paris | 01:47:30 | |
| Hennessy Carson | 2024 Madrid | 01:47:55 | |
| Turquie Arredondo Raul | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:47:28 | |
| Tang Justin | 2023 Melbourne | 01:48:19 | |
| Sullivan Richard | 2024 New York | 01:48:00 | |
| Ho Ming Kelvin Lee | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:47:50 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
