Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Paris using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Dear George's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Dear George's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Dear George's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Dear George's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:07. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:54 | 45:16 to 43:22 | 61.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:43 | 06:07 to 05:24 | 23.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:16 | 05:25 to 05:09 | 8.6% |
| Wall Balls | 00:13 | 06:43 to 06:30 | 7.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:01 | 02:11 to 02:10 | 0.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:09 to 04:09 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:31 to 02:31 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:57 to 03:57 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:44 to 04:44 | 0.0% |
| Dear George | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:27 | 00:00 | 04:47 -00:20 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:09 | 04:27 | 04:30 -00:21 | 04:47 -00:20 |
| Running 2 | 05:12 | 08:36 | 05:06 +00:06 | 09:17 -00:41 |
| Sled Push | 02:31 | 13:48 | 03:03 -00:32 | 14:23 -00:35 |
| Running 3 | 05:32 | 16:19 | 05:35 -00:03 | 17:26 -01:07 |
| Sled Pull | 03:57 | 21:51 | 05:11 -01:14 | 23:01 -01:10 |
| Running 4 | 05:58 | 25:48 | 05:34 +00:24 | 28:12 -02:24 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:07 | 31:46 | 05:42 +00:25 | 33:46 -02:00 |
| Running 5 | 05:52 | 37:53 | 05:45 +00:07 | 39:28 -01:35 |
| Rowing | 04:44 | 43:45 | 04:53 -00:09 | 45:13 -01:28 |
| Running 6 | 05:52 | 48:29 | 05:35 +00:17 | 50:06 -01:37 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:11 | 54:21 | 02:17 -00:06 | 55:41 -01:20 |
| Running 7 | 05:43 | 56:32 | 05:34 +00:09 | 57:58 -01:26 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:25 | 01:02:15 | 05:24 +00:01 | 01:03:32 -01:17 |
| Running 8 | 06:44 | 01:07:40 | 06:16 +00:28 | 01:08:56 -01:16 |
| Wall Balls | 06:43 | 01:14:24 | 06:54 -00:11 | 01:15:12 -00:48 |
| Roxzone | 08:24 | 01:29:24 | 07:18 +01:06 | 01:29:24 |
George Dear showed a laudable performance in the 2024 Paris Hyrox race, placing in the top 65% of his age group and top 59% of overall athletes. His strength-based exercises, such as the Ski Erg and Sled Pull, were significantly faster than average, placing him in the top 10 percentile. This indicates that George has a robust strength profile. However, his total running time was slower than average by 52 seconds, implying a need for enhancement in his running ability. His initial pace in the first running segment was faster than average, but it gradually slowed down as the race progressed, suggesting that he might have started too fast.
Considering George's performance, certain strategies can be applied for future races. Firstly, managing the initial race pace can help preserve energy for later segments. Secondly, focusing on swift transitions between exercises can help save valuable time. Lastly, incorporating a balanced training routine with an emphasis on running can help improve overall performance. Regularly practicing the challenging segments under compromised running scenarios can also prepare George better for the race conditions.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mcglone Christopher | 2024 Glasgow | 01:29:46 | |
| Peake Richard | 2024 Sydney | 01:29:40 | |
| Delle Donne Nicola | 2024 Milan | 01:29:12 | |
| Straatman Martijn | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:29:10 | |
| Malkera Mohammad | 2023 Glasgow | 01:29:26 | |
| Van Steeg Bart | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:28:54 | |
| Lotfi Edouard Oussama | 2024 Marseille | 01:29:16 | |
| Young Chris | 2024 Birmingham | 01:29:38 | |
| Oehri Christopher | 2022 Basel | 01:29:45 | |
| Zaryczański Michał | 2024 Poznan | 01:29:35 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
