Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2021 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 607 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Brush Kimberley's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Brush Kimberley's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Brush Kimberley's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Brush Kimberley's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 09:59. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 09:59 | 01:02:18 to 52:19 | 100.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:44 to 04:44 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:49 to 01:49 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:29 to 04:29 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:18 to 06:18 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:27 to 05:27 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:13 to 02:13 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:53 to 04:53 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:26 to 03:26 | 0.0% |
| Brush Kimberley | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:33 | 00:00 | 05:44 -00:11 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:44 | 05:33 | 05:25 -00:41 | 05:44 -00:11 |
| Running 2 | 06:13 | 10:17 | 06:16 -00:03 | 11:09 -00:52 |
| Sled Push | 01:49 | 16:30 | 03:09 -01:20 | 17:25 -00:55 |
| Running 3 | 06:49 | 18:19 | 06:39 +00:10 | 20:34 -02:15 |
| Sled Pull | 04:29 | 25:08 | 06:56 -02:27 | 27:13 -02:05 |
| Running 4 | 06:59 | 29:37 | 06:41 +00:18 | 34:09 -04:32 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:18 | 36:36 | 08:01 -01:43 | 40:50 -04:14 |
| Running 5 | 09:46 | 42:54 | 06:54 +02:52 | 48:51 -05:57 |
| Rowing | 05:27 | 52:40 | 05:47 -00:20 | 55:45 -03:05 |
| Running 6 | 07:37 | 58:07 | 06:47 +00:50 | 01:01:32 -03:25 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:13 | 01:05:44 | 02:36 -00:23 | 01:08:19 -02:35 |
| Running 7 | 08:29 | 01:07:57 | 06:46 +01:43 | 01:10:55 -02:58 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:53 | 01:16:26 | 05:57 -01:04 | 01:17:41 -01:15 |
| Running 8 | 10:56 | 01:21:19 | 07:32 +03:24 | 01:23:38 -02:19 |
| Wall Balls | 03:26 | 01:32:15 | 06:27 -03:01 | 01:31:10 +01:05 |
| Roxzone | 10:46 | 01:46:20 | 08:43 +02:03 | 01:46:20 |
Kimberley's total running time of 01:02:18 is 11 minutes and 9 seconds slower than the average for her finish time. This indicates that she may need to focus on improving her running ability in order to enhance her overall performance. Additionally, her best running lap time of 00:05:33 is 3 seconds slower than the average, suggesting that she could benefit from working on her pace and speed during running segments.
By implementing these training strategies and techniques, Kimberley Brush can improve her overall performance in future Hyrox races. It is important for her to tailor her training to address the specific areas of improvement identified in this report. With dedication and consistent effort, she has the potential to achieve even better results in her next race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lambert Jessica | 2024 Birmingham | 01:46:38 | |
| Serruau Marie | 2024 Paris | 01:45:51 | |
| Florio Katie | 2022 Los Angeles | 01:46:38 | |
| Colon Kaylee | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:46:35 | |
| Biggs Helen | 2024 London | 01:46:38 | |
| Manning Emily | 2024 Melbourne | 01:46:10 | |
| Taylor Carly | 2024 Melbourne | 01:46:08 | |
| Raynor Rowann | 2024 Stockholm | 01:46:41 | |
| Jeng Madeline | 2024 Taipei | 01:46:30 | |
| VohraCopley Senita | 2024 Birmingham | 01:46:26 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
