Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Milan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Zurlo Antonio's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Zurlo Antonio's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Zurlo Antonio's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Zurlo Antonio's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:14. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:09 | 07:04 to 04:55 | 41.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 01:02 | 03:03 to 02:01 | 19.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:48 | 03:28 to 02:40 | 15.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:47 | 05:22 to 04:35 | 15.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:12 | 04:58 to 04:46 | 3.8% |
| Rowing | 00:11 | 04:54 to 04:43 | 3.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:05 | 04:27 to 04:22 | 1.6% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:48 to 05:48 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 38:50 to 38:50 | 0.0% |
| Zurlo Antonio | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:00 | 00:00 | 04:34 +00:26 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:27 | 05:00 | 04:25 +00:02 | 04:34 +00:26 |
| Running 2 | 04:36 | 09:27 | 04:54 -00:18 | 08:59 +00:28 |
| Sled Push | 03:28 | 14:03 | 02:52 +00:36 | 13:53 +00:10 |
| Running 3 | 04:53 | 17:31 | 05:21 -00:28 | 16:45 +00:46 |
| Sled Pull | 05:22 | 22:24 | 04:51 +00:31 | 22:06 +00:18 |
| Running 4 | 04:57 | 27:46 | 05:19 -00:22 | 26:57 +00:49 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:04 | 32:43 | 05:13 +01:51 | 32:16 +00:27 |
| Running 5 | 05:02 | 39:47 | 05:29 -00:27 | 37:29 +02:18 |
| Rowing | 04:54 | 44:49 | 04:47 +00:07 | 42:58 +01:51 |
| Running 6 | 05:07 | 49:43 | 05:21 -00:14 | 47:45 +01:58 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:03 | 54:50 | 02:08 +00:55 | 53:06 +01:44 |
| Running 7 | 05:14 | 57:53 | 05:19 -00:05 | 55:14 +02:39 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:58 | 01:03:07 | 05:00 -00:02 | 01:00:33 +02:34 |
| Running 8 | 04:05 | 01:08:05 | 05:55 -01:50 | 01:05:33 +02:32 |
| Wall Balls | 05:48 | 01:12:10 | 06:22 -00:34 | 01:11:28 +00:42 |
| Roxzone | 06:44 | 01:24:32 | 06:42 +00:02 | 01:24:32 |
Antonio Zurlo delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Milan Hyrox event, securing an overall rank of 502, placing him in the top 36% of all participants. Within his age group (30-34), he ranked 148, showing a competitive edge. Notably, Antonio demonstrated a strong running profile, with a total running time of 00:38:50, which was 03:46 faster than the average, indicating his proficiency as a runner. However, his pacing strategy could be fine-tuned; he started slightly slower than average in the initial running segments but finished exceptionally strong, as evidenced by his best lap time of 00:04:05. This suggests a well-managed energy distribution throughout the race with a significant closing kick.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Grant James | 2023 Birmingham | 01:24:10 | |
| Falzon Matthew | 2024 Melbourne | 01:24:50 | |
| Cook Andy | 2024 Paris | 01:24:49 | |
| Dimitri Dzian Dimitri | 2023 Paris | 01:24:51 | |
| Mastrangelo Gabriel | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:24:34 | |
| Mills Robert | 2024 Manchester | 01:25:02 | |
| Lloyd Edward | 2024 Manchester | 01:24:54 | |
| Giles David | 2024 Madrid | 01:24:30 | |
| Vasseur Mickael | 2023 Paris | 01:24:16 | |
| Seahorn Jarrod | 2024 Dallas | 01:24:20 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
