Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Rowley Jack's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Rowley Jack's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Rowley Jack's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Rowley Jack's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:21. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:18 | 05:52 to 04:34 | 29.9% |
| Sled Pull | 01:15 | 05:34 to 04:19 | 28.7% |
| Wall Balls | 00:43 | 06:18 to 05:35 | 16.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:34 | 03:05 to 02:31 | 13.0% |
| Rowing | 00:14 | 04:51 to 04:37 | 5.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:11 | 04:40 to 04:29 | 4.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:06 | 04:23 to 04:17 | 2.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:51 to 01:51 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 36:18 to 36:18 | 0.0% |
| Rowley Jack | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:05 | 00:00 | 04:28 +00:37 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:23 | 05:05 | 04:23 +00:00 | 04:28 +00:37 |
| Running 2 | 04:18 | 09:28 | 04:46 -00:28 | 08:51 +00:37 |
| Sled Push | 03:05 | 13:46 | 02:46 +00:19 | 13:37 +00:09 |
| Running 3 | 04:21 | 16:51 | 05:10 -00:49 | 16:23 +00:28 |
| Sled Pull | 05:34 | 21:12 | 04:40 +00:54 | 21:33 -00:21 |
| Running 4 | 04:21 | 26:46 | 05:08 -00:47 | 26:13 +00:33 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:52 | 31:07 | 04:57 +00:55 | 31:21 -00:14 |
| Running 5 | 04:35 | 36:59 | 05:17 -00:42 | 36:18 +00:41 |
| Rowing | 04:51 | 41:34 | 04:43 +00:08 | 41:35 -00:01 |
| Running 6 | 04:34 | 46:25 | 05:11 -00:37 | 46:18 +00:07 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:51 | 50:59 | 02:05 -00:14 | 51:29 -00:30 |
| Running 7 | 04:26 | 52:50 | 05:08 -00:42 | 53:34 -00:44 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:40 | 57:16 | 04:50 -00:10 | 58:42 -01:26 |
| Running 8 | 04:41 | 01:01:56 | 05:40 -00:59 | 01:03:32 -01:36 |
| Wall Balls | 06:18 | 01:06:37 | 06:05 +00:13 | 01:09:12 -02:35 |
| Roxzone | 08:50 | 01:21:36 | 06:19 +02:31 | 01:21:36 |
Jack Rowley's performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race was commendable, finishing in the top 26% overall and the top 31% in his age group of 25-29. He demonstrated a strong aptitude for running, finishing the total running time a significant 04:46 faster than the average. However, his ability to transition between exercises and recovery periods needs improvement as indicated by his Roxzone time, which was 02:35 slower than the average. His performance from Running 1 to Running 4 indicates that he started the race slower than average but significantly increased his pace as the race progressed. This suggests a need for better pacing strategy at the start of the race.
Jack should consider implementing the following strategies for better race performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lasarko Sr Marcus | 2024 Dallas | 01:21:37 | |
| Drewlow Jonathan | 2023 Stuttgart | 01:21:50 | |
| Bielchen Christian | 2023 München | 01:21:41 | |
| Hager Mathias | 2024 Stockholm | 01:21:39 | |
| Fettig Lukas | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:21:20 | |
| Reece James | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:21:19 | |
| Skarmoutsos Sotirios | 2024 Melbourne | 01:21:56 | |
| Muller Félix | 2023 Barcelona | 01:21:45 | |
| Smith Ben | 2024 Madrid | 01:21:45 | |
| Kirschbaum Kai | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:21:16 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
