Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Chicago using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Kemp Matthew's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Kemp Matthew's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Kemp Matthew's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Kemp Matthew's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:50. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:22 | 35:53 to 34:31 | 35.7% |
| Sled Pull | 00:34 | 04:02 to 03:28 | 14.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:26 | 04:03 to 03:37 | 11.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:24 | 03:50 to 03:26 | 10.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:23 | 02:22 to 01:59 | 10.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:23 | 04:50 to 04:27 | 10.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:10 | 04:12 to 04:02 | 4.3% |
| Rowing | 00:08 | 04:28 to 04:20 | 3.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:35 to 01:35 | 0.0% |
| Kemp Matthew | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:29 | 00:00 | 03:58 -00:29 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:12 | 03:29 | 04:11 +00:01 | 03:58 -00:29 |
| Running 2 | 04:17 | 07:41 | 04:15 +00:02 | 08:09 -00:28 |
| Sled Push | 02:22 | 11:58 | 02:26 -00:04 | 12:24 -00:26 |
| Running 3 | 04:40 | 14:20 | 04:33 +00:07 | 14:50 -00:30 |
| Sled Pull | 04:02 | 19:00 | 03:59 +00:03 | 19:23 -00:23 |
| Running 4 | 04:38 | 23:02 | 04:32 +00:06 | 23:22 -00:20 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:50 | 27:40 | 04:01 -00:11 | 27:54 -00:14 |
| Running 5 | 04:47 | 31:30 | 04:39 +00:08 | 31:55 -00:25 |
| Rowing | 04:28 | 36:17 | 04:28 +00:00 | 36:34 -00:17 |
| Running 6 | 04:37 | 40:45 | 04:33 +00:04 | 41:02 -00:17 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:35 | 45:22 | 01:49 -00:14 | 45:35 -00:13 |
| Running 7 | 04:34 | 46:57 | 04:33 +00:01 | 47:24 -00:27 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:03 | 51:31 | 04:02 +00:01 | 51:57 -00:26 |
| Running 8 | 04:55 | 55:34 | 04:52 +00:03 | 55:59 -00:25 |
| Wall Balls | 04:50 | 01:00:29 | 05:03 -00:13 | 01:00:51 -00:22 |
| Roxzone | 05:47 | 01:10:58 | 05:04 +00:43 | 01:10:58 |
His overall time of 01:10:58 is impressive and showcases his dedication to training and preparation for the race. However, there are specific areas where improvements can be made to further enhance his performance.
In conclusion, Matthew Kemp's performance in the 2023 Chicago Hyrox race was impressive, placing him in the top 5% of all participants. To further enhance his performance, he should focus on improving his running time and reducing time spent in the roxzone. By incorporating specific training strategies, drills, and techniques, he can optimize his performance and continue to excel in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mak Yun Leung | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:11:24 | |
| Bahfir Omar | 2024 London | 01:11:21 | |
| Keul John | 2024 New York | 01:11:16 | |
| Malezieux Theo | 2024 Marseille | 01:11:05 | |
| Vaigel Viktor | 2023 Glasgow | 01:10:47 | |
| Moger Levi | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:11:27 | |
| Bartlett Mike | 2024 Gdansk | 01:11:22 | |
| Ewers Marc | 2024 Köln | 01:11:13 | |
| Stark Collin | 2024 Dallas | 01:10:28 | |
| Novak Mario | 2024 Rimini | 01:10:35 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 New York | 01:06:22 | |
| 2024 Washington - North American Championships | 01:08:04 | |
| 2023 New York | 01:19:03 | |
| 2022 Chicago | 01:24:41 | |
| 2019 New York | 01:27:38 | |
| 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:14:20 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
