Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 933 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Fry Sarah's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Fry Sarah's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Fry Sarah's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Fry Sarah's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:15. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:43 | 05:26 to 03:43 | 32.7% |
| Sled Pull | 01:30 | 05:52 to 04:22 | 28.6% |
| Run Total | 01:22 | 40:53 to 39:31 | 26.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:18 | 02:08 to 01:50 | 5.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:17 | 04:43 to 04:26 | 5.4% |
| Wall Balls | 00:05 | 03:29 to 03:24 | 1.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:28 to 04:28 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:50 to 01:50 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:47 to 04:47 | 0.0% |
| Fry Sarah | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:14 | 00:00 | 04:36 -00:22 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:28 | 04:14 | 04:52 -00:24 | 04:36 -00:22 |
| Running 2 | 04:38 | 08:42 | 04:54 -00:16 | 09:28 -00:46 |
| Sled Push | 01:50 | 13:20 | 02:28 -00:38 | 14:22 -01:02 |
| Running 3 | 05:22 | 15:10 | 05:09 +00:13 | 16:50 -01:40 |
| Sled Pull | 05:52 | 20:32 | 04:56 +00:56 | 21:59 -01:27 |
| Running 4 | 05:08 | 26:24 | 05:09 -00:01 | 26:55 -00:31 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:43 | 31:32 | 05:00 -00:17 | 32:04 -00:32 |
| Running 5 | 05:26 | 36:15 | 05:15 +00:11 | 37:04 -00:49 |
| Rowing | 04:47 | 41:41 | 05:05 -00:18 | 42:19 -00:38 |
| Running 6 | 05:29 | 46:28 | 05:12 +00:17 | 47:24 -00:56 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:08 | 51:57 | 02:01 +00:07 | 52:36 -00:39 |
| Running 7 | 05:16 | 54:05 | 05:10 +00:06 | 54:37 -00:32 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:26 | 59:21 | 04:05 +01:21 | 59:47 -00:26 |
| Running 8 | 05:24 | 01:04:47 | 05:28 -00:04 | 01:03:52 +00:55 |
| Wall Balls | 03:29 | 01:10:11 | 04:05 -00:36 | 01:09:20 +00:51 |
| Roxzone | 05:31 | 01:19:02 | 05:37 -00:06 | 01:19:02 |
Sarah Fry delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox, finishing 105th overall and 25th in her age group, placing her in the top 5% and 7% respectively. With a total running time of 00:40:53, Sarah demonstrated a strong running profile, outperforming the average by 26 seconds. Her pacing strategy appeared consistent, as she maintained faster-than-average running times in her early segments, indicating an initial strong start. However, she experienced some slowdown in the middle segments, which could suggest minor fatigue or the impact of high-intensity exercises like the sled pull and sandbag lunges. Overall, Sarah shows a hybrid profile with better running capabilities.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Irsch Katrin | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:18:42 | |
| Amengual Frau Bàrbara | 2023 Barcelona | 01:19:05 | |
| Roche Janine | 2024 Paris | 01:18:35 | |
| Silvestrini Beatrice | 2024 Turin | 01:19:24 | |
| Hochweg Marica | 2024 Berlin | 01:19:21 | |
| Slater Georgia | 2024 Manchester | 01:19:10 | |
| Dale Jessica Stephanie | 2023 London | 01:18:57 | |
| Pélissier Hélène | 2024 Berlin | 01:19:24 | |
| Mansell Kim | 2023 Dublin | 01:19:07 | |
| Ermolenko Viktoriia | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:18:56 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
